It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
we have also had ice ages hitting with co2 in thousands of ppm range.
If climate scientists were claiming CO2 was the only driver of climate, then high CO2 during glacial periods would be problematic. But any climate scientist will tell you CO2 is not the only driver of climate.
Atmospheric CO2 levels have reached spectacular values in the deep past, possibly topping over 5000 ppm in the late Ordovician around 440 million years ago. However, solar activity also falls as you go further back. In the early Phanerozoic, solar output was about 4% less than current levels.
Originally posted by Atzil321
reply to post by pikestaff
There are natural and human caused carbon dioxide sources. The natural sources are much larger than human sources. However, over geologic time (billions of years) the natural sources have managed to balance themselves out so that life as we like it can survive. Maintaining this balance is part of the carbon cycle. Changing the CO2 balance is a big deal.
Have you looked for an answer to that question? Just by doing a quick google search I can see enough information on the subject to keep me busy for weeks
I never see an answer to that question.
Originally posted by jaxnmarko
reply to post by auraelium
The seas are not rising? Tell that to the Islanders of the South Pacific, the Maldives, and many other low island nations. The earth isn't warming? So the glaciers that are retreating quickly, as proven by photographs taken over decades, are all fakes. The North Pole isn't melting and the polar bears and walruses aren't losing their sea ice? Tell that to the ships that can only now get through the Arctic Northwest Passage. If ignorance is bliss you must be quite happy. How much we contribute is debatable. The FACT that changes are happening rapidly, is NOT. Do you read only opinions or actual scientific data sources? The amount of evidence is huge. Let denial only be a River in Africa.
Originally posted by expat2368
Nobody has convinced me yet that CO2 is bad... It makes plants grow better and create more Oxygen.
Originally posted by expat2368
Build a "box" 1 mile by 1 mile.. by 25 feet tall... you can fit every living human on the Earth in it. We represent less than 1 part in almost 5 billion of the atmosphere... and anyone is going to convince me that we are changing the climate?.... Road apples!! (the falling produce of horses)
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by Atzil321
Do you realize that even the LARGEST swings in global CO2 only resulted in a temp increase on average of a few degrees?
Originally posted by auraelium
Both are irrelevant because Co2 doesnt warm the earth to any great degree.
Originally posted by auraelium
The Elephant in the room for a long time now and AGW doomsayers have been burying their heads in the sand over it for years is that Co2 doesnt cause warming ...but warming causes Co2.