It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SickeningTruths
Third: He said that ship should have been able to take ALL THE HITS IT TOOK and still shouldn't have sank. He said, when a ship is set for inspection, ALL the doors and hatches are open. he said thats the ONLY way they could have sunk that ship.
Really? He said that the Arizona should have survived the detonation of its forward ammunition magazine, the result of a bomb penetrating forward of turret #2? I would think that the entire front end of the ship being destroyed might cause it to sink. But I'm not ex-Navy.
edit on 9/9/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nake13
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SickeningTruths
Third: He said that ship should have been able to take ALL THE HITS IT TOOK and still shouldn't have sank. He said, when a ship is set for inspection, ALL the doors and hatches are open. he said thats the ONLY way they could have sunk that ship.
Really? He said that the Arizona should have survived the detonation of its forward ammunition magazine, the result of a bomb penetrating forward of turret #2? I would think that the entire front end of the ship being destroyed might cause it to sink. But I'm not ex-Navy.
edit on 9/9/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
I would imagine what was meant was,theoretically ,in the case of a torpedo hit and with the watertight doors shut,She could have stayed afloat,as the forward magazine would be protected on the port and starboard side by armour plate,however,as you state,that scenario did not take into account HE bombs delivered by dive bombers hitting the essentially unarmoured forward deck area.
Originally posted by Nicolas Flamel
Originally posted by nake13
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by SickeningTruths
Third: He said that ship should have been able to take ALL THE HITS IT TOOK and still shouldn't have sank. He said, when a ship is set for inspection, ALL the doors and hatches are open. he said thats the ONLY way they could have sunk that ship.
Really? He said that the Arizona should have survived the detonation of its forward ammunition magazine, the result of a bomb penetrating forward of turret #2? I would think that the entire front end of the ship being destroyed might cause it to sink. But I'm not ex-Navy.
edit on 9/9/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
I would imagine what was meant was,theoretically ,in the case of a torpedo hit and with the watertight doors shut,She could have stayed afloat,as the forward magazine would be protected on the port and starboard side by armour plate,however,as you state,that scenario did not take into account HE bombs delivered by dive bombers hitting the essentially unarmoured forward deck area.
The Japanese used a special type of bomb for the Pear Harbor attack, namely the 1,800 lb. Type 99 #80 mark 5 armor piercing bomb. It was basically a battleship shell with bomb fins attached. They also used specially modified torpedoes for the shallow waters of Pearl Harbor.
So now I guess it just boils down to why didn't the US Gov. do anything about the alleged warnings? Was this in a a sense a "False Flag" or was it just good ole stupidity.
Originally posted by SickeningTruths
He said he knows on good authority that the guy in the watch tower where the Japanese came flying in was on a 24 hour watch the day before and then set in the watch tower with out a break or sleep. He said the guy was fast asleep until it was too late as the huge wave of japs came flying over.
Second:
He said there was a military inspection for the USS Arizona that NEVER took place. He said that if the inspection were to have taken place at the time of the attack it would have been over 15 mins late. following this statement with "when have you ever heard of the military being late for a mandatory inspection?"
Third:
He said that ship should have been able to take ALL THE HITS IT TOOK and still shouldn't have sank. He said, when a ship is set for inspection, ALL the doors and hatches are open. he said thats the ONLY way they could have sunk that ship.
Originally posted by SickeningTruths
Ok guys, my second thread here so bare with me.
So I have not done ANY research into this "theory" YET.. However I have done a lot of talking with X military personnel and that's pretty much where all my info is coming from.
So here we go. For a few years now I've had the opportunity to talk with a few x military personnel about there thoughts about the pearl harbor attacks. This all started when I was talking with a retired high ranking Army-man. We starting talking about a few of the popular conspiracys 9/11 , area 51... etc
Then we got on the topic of Pearl Harbor. He made a few interesting statements.
First one is this,
He said he knows on good authority that the guy in the watch tower where the Japanese came flying in was on a 24 hour watch the day before and then set in the watch tower with out a break or sleep. He said the guy was fast asleep until it was too late as the huge wave of japs came flying over.
Second:
He said there was a military inspection for the USS Arizona that NEVER took place. He said that if the inspection were to have taken place at the time of the attack it would have been over 15 mins late. following this statement with "when have you ever heard of the military being late for a mandatory inspection?"
Third:
He said that ship should have been able to take ALL THE HITS IT TOOK and still shouldn't have sank. He said, when a ship is set for inspection, ALL the doors and hatches are open. he said thats the ONLY way they could have sunk that ship.
I asked him if all the hatches and doors and windows (whatever) were opened, how were there still bodies trapped inside. and he said thats because when the attack hit, they were scrambling to lock it down so that is WOULDN'T sink, but obviously didn't get it fast enough.
So besides all that, I've heard from other military personnel that we had a warning from the Australians stating there was a "FLEET" of Japanese on there way... So yea... lets get this party started!
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by Old77
that and putting to bed an out dated fleet, FDR knew 2 weeks before this happened he got word from WC , and from Australia & New Zealand coast watchers, japan was in China at this time, making the move south, but this fleet, that would attack Pearl Harbor, sink the Arizona, and the go on to attack mid way, was spotted heading due east , first thought was SF LA, west coast USA, that is why the ACC's, (air craft carriers)were not in pearl.
was it right for FDR to sacrifice few for the good of many? should the fleet been warned better? nice in war games, but the fleet was a thirsty fleet, and slow some facts on the BB-39 www.history.navy.mil... and on the sister ship www.navsource.org... here is her battle action and fate, what a sad way to go for a good ship www.hazegray.org...
no i am not navy, but i do know a good ship, just like o'l MO, big MO or better AKA as Mighty MO www.history.navy.mil... there is a 12 knot difference 21knot old ships BB-38 and BB-39, 33 knot speed for BB-63
Pearl Harbor Conspiracy
Originally posted by redoubt
reply to post by SickeningTruths
Pearl Harbor Conspiracy
The 'FDR sold out the US via Pearl Harbor' has been going longer than the 'FDR sold out the US to Russia in Germany'.
I dunno. Even if we had sortied our entire bloody fleet, it would have still been war because the Imperial Japanese Navy had a mission and whether it happened at Pearl or out at sea, the outcome would have been conflict. In fact, I think we would have suffered worse in a sea borne fight because the US might have well lost its entire carrier force at that time. We basically didn't have the tactics and weaponry we did later.
You may want to read "Shattered Sword" which details the ultimate fate of Kido Butai. It centers around the Battle of Midway when Nimitz did everything right and Nagumo was incompetent at best.
Originally posted by Dr Expired
Personally I believe the Japanese were lured into attacking Pearl Harbour.
But before we condemm Churchill and Roosevelt, perhaps we need to imagine a world where Hitler is in control,and Stalin is his only threat , holed up in Siberia.
edit on 10-9-2011 by Dr Expired because: spellin