It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LifeIsEnergy
reply to post by Novise
I think it takes a person who grew up somewhat privileged (at least like any middle class American), who did not struggle to eat or survive everyday and had almost an abundance of pleasure available to them, to have the necessary attributes to seek enlightenment. When you have been deprived of these things for most of your life, it seems like you would be more inclined to grasp on to whatever little amount of pleasure you could find, thus making renunciation and liberation very difficult to accept as suitable paths.
Originally posted by trika3000
In my youth when looking into different religions i seriously looked into Buddhism and Buddha Gautama. And one thing always stood out to me as being somewhat irreconcilable to the supposed "good" nature of the Buddha, didn't the Buddha abandon his wife and son?
Originally posted by nakiannunaki
It is only by letting go of the need for anything that we become part of the whole and by becoming part of the whole we treat everything and everyone as us.
That is why people were attracted to Buddha because they saw themselves in him as much as he saw himself in them.
Originally posted by Jamjar
reply to post by Novise
Buddhism is a system that relies on the individual, it asks of a person to feel, it asks how would you feel if for example someone stole from you, if you would feel hurt then is right to inflict that on another? if someone shows you kindness and it makes you feel good then isn't it right that you show others kindness.
This is what drives Buddhist virtue.
But virtue is only the beginning of the path.
In Buddhism being educated can be seen as a dis advantage as it can lead to an individual trying to understand from an intellectual POV.
Being wealthy can lead to procrastination.
You could say that Buddha dismantled the caste system as his teaching could be understood and practised by everyone, and no you don't need to be Buddhist to understand this, just human.
edit on 7-9-2011 by Jamjar because: (no reason given)