posted on Sep, 5 2011 @ 09:52 AM
I'm afraid I can' t watch it right now because I can't turn the sound up, but I will later.
I always want to ask, when I hear about these FEMA camps and all- why is it no one seems to consider the possibility of those being shelter to save
I mean, I am pretty sure that if any sort of catastrophy (natural or otherwise) turned out to be a big possibility, the government would NOT alert the
public. At least I wouldn't, if I was up there!
But I would get working on doing whatever I could to have some protection and shelter for survivors and a way of dealing with the bodies of those who
In the event, for example, of a EMP attack, the chaos would be incredible. There is really much to think about.
Besides the fighting for food, water, and shelter, there'd be no medicines either..... and that huge part of the population that is on
antidepressants and antipsychotics??? Well, they are going to suffer serious withdrawal and regress into serious psychosis! That's a lot fo nutcakes
to add to the batter of normal minds thrown into struggle for survival! The government better be ready for rounding those nutters up to protect us-
AND making sure they don't get their hands on weapons!! -oops, that's a problem with the Constitution though. Better respect and give those many
schizos running around losing their head in your town a gun?
I am not saying I know this to be the concerns of FEMA, only that simply embracing hypothesis of malignant intent and ignoring the possibility of the
contrary is rather limited, no?