It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by spy66
So where's all the proof for a creator...you said you had tons, so care to share?
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by spy66
So where's all the proof for a creator...you said you had tons, so care to share?
NO i dont care to share them with you
If you cant figure things out on your own why should i do all your work?
If you know about math and matter as much as you proclaim by your rejection. I shouldn't have to prove anything to you, you should have understood.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by MrXYZ
You call them gaps we can't explain. Why dont you just admit they are gaps you dont have the mind set to grasp.
Given that you don't seem to care about rationality, logic, and objective facts when forming your opinions...I strongly disagree
It seams that you are rather more obsessed by trying to make fun of me than you are trying to see the logic and rationality in what i asked you.
I guess that is logic for people like you with your level of understanding
My questions and this topic is way to difficult for you You have nothing to bring to this discussion. Because your are not the person who is capable of answering properly.
Many of these evolutionists write insults and ridicule as their main focal point if you've noticed their arguments,
they really can't refute anything you say spy .
Originally posted by megabytz
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by spy66
So where's all the proof for a creator...you said you had tons, so care to share?
NO i dont care to share them with you
If you cant figure things out on your own why should i do all your work?
If you know about math and matter as much as you proclaim by your rejection. I shouldn't have to prove anything to you, you should have understood.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
In other words, you have zero proof of a creator beyond wish thinking, personal experience, and faith. Goose egg!
I was a christian for over 20 years until I realized that what I thought was proof was nothing more than my own bias confirming my desire for a sky daddy that watches over and protects us all. I would really like to hear what you consider proof. I am completely open to evidence of a creator but I doubt you have anything that is objective, logical, or hasn't been thoroughly refuted numerous times.
I was a christian for over 20 years until I realized that what I thought was proof was nothing more than my own bias confirming my desire for a sky daddy that watches over and protects us all.
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by MrXYZ
You call them gaps we can't explain. Why dont you just admit they are gaps you dont have the mind set to grasp.
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by MrXYZ
You call them gaps we can't explain. Why dont you just admit they are gaps you dont have the mind set to grasp.
And you do? Care to show us any evidence?
The "questions" you posted had nothing to do with evolution or creationism. In fact, when I asked you to show how your "questions" were pertinent, you went strangely silent.edit on 9-9-2011 by john_bmth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by megabytz
Wow! You would think a person would try to keep up with things that they comment on.
Evolution of humans is based on far more than "a box of bones".
Evolution 'hoaxes' are not rampant and the hoaxes of the past are not in modern textbooks. Not only that, the hoaxes were not perpetrated by evolutionary biologist but they were shown to be hoaxes by scientists.
There is mountains of evidence that species have evolved into new distinct species. We have witnessed it, multiple times.
One last thing, evolution has been proven and has withstood scrutiny for the past 150 years. Creationism on the other hand doesn't even begin to resemble science. It makes no predictions, no coherent statements, and cannot stand on its own without misrepresenting evolution with falsehoods. Similar to your previous post.
Now if you would like to learn something about evolution before you make tremendously false statements I would suggest you start by looking over this website and then maybe pick up any Stephen Jay Gould book.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
When are people going to wake up to the fact that Evolution VS Creationism is Not a black and white issue. It cannot be all or nothing. The answer lies in a balance of the two.
Lets say a creator did set things in motion.. that creator created many animals plants other forms of life to Evolve. We have proof of evolution in nature easily found and backed up by science. Does this discount the possibility that an overall creator set things in motion? No. that would be silly.
Would a Divine Creator come down and say science is all hogwash because everything is done by miracles? Nope that too would be silly. If this creator exists He has given Man the ability of reason and thus Science to help us understand our world ( to the very limited amount that it actually does this)
If this Creator does Not exist does this mean that with all the many billions of processes happening each second in the whole universe, that many of the same mathematical constants can never be duplicated? That too would be silly.
From a science point of view we simply lack the knowledge and understanding to explain a God concept. From a religious point of view we believe that God exists outside the so called hard facts of science and must be believed on faith. The two do not ever contradict each other and cannot because that is comparing apples and oranges.
There is room for both belief systems together and they do not cancel each other out. A true believer in God can never say Evolution had no place in the universe because everything is possible with God. There is only prejudice and ignorance of both issues that cause division.
I cant prove or disprove the existence of the Flying Spagetti Monster but I can exercise logic and say its very unlikely.
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by Fretless
I cant prove or disprove the existence of the Flying Spagetti Monster but I can exercise logic and say its very unlikely.
Your logic is no good, there is not one believer who believes in a Flying Spaghetti monster. Unless you have the impression that the creator is a flying spaghetti monster?
Don't compare our logic with yours. You are way of the page.
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by spy66
They're the same, though. Neither have any evidence. You can't seriously claim that some sky pixie who knocked up some goat herder before sending his son to earth to turn into a zombie is any more plausible or less absurd than a flying spaghetti monster waving his noddles to create the earth and suns.
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by megabytz
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by spy66
So where's all the proof for a creator...you said you had tons, so care to share?
NO i dont care to share them with you
If you cant figure things out on your own why should i do all your work?
If you know about math and matter as much as you proclaim by your rejection. I shouldn't have to prove anything to you, you should have understood.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
In other words, you have zero proof of a creator beyond wish thinking, personal experience, and faith. Goose egg!
I was a christian for over 20 years until I realized that what I thought was proof was nothing more than my own bias confirming my desire for a sky daddy that watches over and protects us all. I would really like to hear what you consider proof. I am completely open to evidence of a creator but I doubt you have anything that is objective, logical, or hasn't been thoroughly refuted numerous times.
I was a christian for over 20 years until I realized that what I thought was proof was nothing more than my own bias confirming my desire for a sky daddy that watches over and protects us all.
What you believe or did believe in disproves nothing. It only proves how easy your are fooled by your own mind and science. What you believe and understand sure as hell dont disprove anything i have said.
All you have to do is disprove what i have talked about. "I have posted questions". You have posted no answers, just accusations.
You are a waste of time. Because you don't do your own thinking, you have to search the nett for answers you have no understanding of. If you did have understanding, you would have posted a proper reply with proof of just that.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by john_bmth
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
No, pi is a mathematical concept that describes the ratio of a circle's circumference to it's diameter. Such geometric shapes exist in nature, therefore they can be described with mathematics. This has absolutely nothing to do with evolution whatsoever. The fact you think it does only shows your ignorance of the fields of evolution and mathematics.
It sure is. But what you say tell us nothing about how these circles/twists came to be.
The string theory is about vacuums, different types of vacuums. How did the absolute vacuum form the circles and twists that gave us "pi" ?
And what exactly do you mean by "tells us nothing how these circles/twists came to be"?
A absolute vacuum would equal a straight neutral string without circles and twists.
If the absolute vacuum is thee string, within string theory. How did the string change on its own and create circles and twists?