If you are not sure who or what the creator was or did, how can you categorically state that there is undeniable proof.
Undeniable proof requires that you provide this proof, now that you are confronted with questions you cannot provide answers. The standard situation
when sweeping statements are made that cannot be backed up.
Me thinks you started something and now you are lost for answers.
edit on 5-9-2011 by Sailor Sam because: (no reason given)
I mean, im not sure that it was the "Annunaki" who created us, i am positive we were created by a designer though.
Watch the video, and do the math, the answers are there .
See the other almost identical thread with about the same title for further discussion.
If we can imagine that our universe was created, then we must have the power to create it. What else could?
Looks like we just forgot. Can you go back and meticulously remember everything you ever created? It's hard!
And this creation obviously happened a long time ago, which makes it even harder to remember. And though I might sound like I'm being facetious, I'm
not. Everything I have studied points to the above-stated idea as the closest one to the truth. We're all part of it because we all decided to be.
And before we became children in the playground we had to build a playground to be children in!
I'll admit nothing but believe there is much more to our existence than anything we are aware of. Why evolution? why do scientist's perform
experiment's? basic curiosity, the unknown. Being omnipotent would be boring if you knew how everything was going to be. It'd be like playing with a
train track eternally. You might be able to redesign it, add a few turns, but at the end of the day its still going round in circles following the
Oh god... first reptilians controlling Intel because of logo, and now this....
You know, the evolution can't be something you believe in or not, you either accept the facts or ignore them. Without evolution, nothing in biology
makes sense. Its not open for discussion, it has been proven to be true for decades, and nothing has undermined it so far.
And to your "proof" - you have proven nothing. Most of planets and suns doesnt even have the shape of a perfect sphere, because they are stretched
by gravity, they resemble shape of an egg.
Galaxies have something to do with pi ? What ? You have serious problems.
The universe could be created from nothing - quantum fluctuations. If you want to know more, I recommend this video
You know how hard is to get something peer reviewed ? I bet you dont. Your post proves again totally nothing.
This is hardly proof. You've leapt from "anomalous constants" to "we were created" without doing any of the intermediate work. You're either
completely ignoring or are unaware of the anthropic principle -- maybe these constants aren't anomalous, but required for life to emerge so that they
can be observed. Other universes, where these constants differ significantly may not have life as a result. It's just Douglas Adams's puddle in a
Imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, "This is an interesting world I find myself in — an interesting hole I find myself in —
fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!"
We, and evolution, are a product of the natural laws of the universe from the time of its creation, whether you believe in a creator or a naturalistic
explanation for its emergence.
As for this piece of tripe: just because the ratio of a circle’s diameter to its circumference is always the same, and because a particular
ratio with some very widespread practical applications unsurprisingly turns up rather often in nature, evolution is false?
By that logic, evolution is false because one plus one always equals two.
math proves that chemicals will always react the same way not that it was created..
but i will admit there is obviously some evidence of the universe being created but this same evidence can be used to prove completely different stuff
aswell.. its all circumstantial..
the fibonacci sequence is something i am very interested in and think that it holds a lot of clues to life and the universe.. but ultimately it shows
everything is predictable because the chemicals that make up everything will always do the same thing
Your assumption may be correct, it may not.
But would it not facilitate the view that the creation of the universe gave rise to the process of evolution, along with all the other myriad
of cycles and systems we observe?
edit on 5-9-2011 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)
Personally i look upon creation of existence like i look upon a seed. The seed contains all the necessities needed to create the existence, us and how
we perceive everything.
The seed can not create anything unless it has all the components within it self. Evolution is not really wrong, except from that the strongest and
the most adaptable organism will survive is false. Who will survive and evolve is already pre programmed in the development/expansion of the
All of what is covered in these videos is mentioned in the first few verses of the Bible. There is too much to say here so I'll just link to the
article I wrote on the subject: LINK
Here are the two key ideas:
We are created in an image and in the image of God. Genesis 1:27 says it both ways:
New International Version (NIV)
27 So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.
The trinity can be seen in physics. Light is both a particle and a wave. The wave is what carries the light to form. The Father is said to be
light. The Son is said to be Word in John 1. The Holy Spirit is the consciousness of God. Each soul contains spirit and is placed in a body made of
particle and wave. The conscious spirit animates the body. All life carries this spark of light consciousness. The article continues the thought
There's so many things wrong in your post, I don't know where to start...
1) Not all planets have water.
2) Planets aren't actually perfect circles.
3) You also don't seem to understand what phi really means.
And most importantly, a common characteristic doesn't automatically mean there's something like a creator.You're bascially using the argument from
ignorance, because you're implying something is the case just because it hasn't been proven wrong. Nothing you posted disproves evolution...and how
could it? In over 150 years it hasn't been disproven. We have DNA evidence, fossil records for hundreds of species, migratory trend patterns, and
actively use the findings in modern medicine. Hell, we can PREDICT outcomes based on theory, something that would be impossible if it were wrong.
In short, sorry, but your post (and the video) are nonsense
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2013, The Above Network, LLC.