I am going to copy and paste this comment posted on inforwars, its a good comment and I couldn't of said it any better, nor type it better, lol, so
all credit to the poster of the this comment.
S&F OP
original comment to story on inforwars
ES 2012 says: <-------not me lol
September 3, 2011 at 9:59 am
Amazingly there are several disconnects in this whole story. I realize that infowars didn’t actually write the piece, but by copy/pasting it they
are showing a certain amount of support for it. Here are a couple problems I am having with this propaganda piece…..
The allegation is that the USG is somehow violating this individuals rights, however it is clear from the articles that the individual isn’t a
citizen of the US. While I believe it is prudent to obey the rule of law and extend civility to all peoples when accusing them of a crime, this
individual is not a citizen of the US. So all the blowhaha about “rights and protections engraved into the Constitution with the full force of our
founding father’s very own flesh and blood” probably doesn’t actually apply to this case.
On the other side of the coin, why was this family allowed to come into the US in 2007? After the events of 2001, I would think that it would be next
to impossible to enter the US from a region that is home to what the SD has labeled a terrorist organization.
After those two points there are only questions….. How long has the intelligence services known the accused was trained by the terrorists? Why was
he allowed to come into the country when an 84 year old citizen isn’t allowed to ride on an airplane without proving she isn’t hiding something in
her diaper?
This may or may not have been a good catch by the Feds, there aren’t enough facts here to make a rational judgment.
