Originally posted by stumason
I think it is absurd to claim that they are advancing (and NATO isn't doing the advancing..the rebels are) just because a arandom blog with a
suspiciously familiar name says so, with no corroboration. What do you think?
That's odd, I thought the militia was controlled by NATO, meaning NATO is actually doing the advancing, or do you think the militias weren't lead to
Tripoli by NATO special ops? Maybe I read those reports incorrectly, and maybe I read the reports which suggested that NATO commanders lead the
militias from the early days of this conflict, or maybe the reports that NATO secret services were operating in Libya, organizing militias way before
any unrest, or the reports of Haftari militia being created, funded, and harbored by US/CIA since 1990s for the soul purpose of cause a regime
From where I'm standing, it looks like NATO is running the show, the militias work for NATO, take commands from NATO, enter cities and towns after
NATO bombings... Do you see what I mean, or is it too hard to comprehend?
Well, that's just not true, is it? I've seen just as much crap come from the pro-Gaddafi crowd as I have from the "NATO" side. It isn't just NATO
doing this though, is it? Arab forces are involved as well and it was the Arab League that requested NATO get involved. People forget
No, I said turn on the TV, what do you see? Al-Jazeera, BBC, MSNBC, FOX News, VOA... All one sided propaganda, even PressTV. As I said before, they
have been consistently trying to silence the other side, why? Regarding the Arab League, I don't think Arab League has any say in this. Arab League
asking NATO to attack Libya is like NATO asking NATO to attack Libya. The Arab Leadership is comprised of mostly puppets.
The TV station was hit, as part of valid 3C targetting. But Libyan State TV was still on the air up until last weekend. Missed that bit, didn't
Nope, I didn't miss that, but you missed my point by a mile, I said they consistently try to silent the other side, from bombings, to even hacking. I
think it has something to do with "controlling the flow of information". Why do you think they want to control the flow of information?
it only went down when the Gaddafi regime ran from Tripoli last week, not because of NATO.
Nope, it went down when NATO militia and special ops entered Tripoli, abducting anything that resembled a Jamahariya supporter, including reporters,
movie actors, black migrant workers, black Libyans... Early estimates suggests at least 50,000 civilians have been abducted only in Tripoli.
They have been asked to surrender and are being given that chance. Any bombing is likely restricted to the Gaddafi loyalists closer to the front along
the road. Over Sirte, Libyan State TV has said NATO has been dropping leaflets, not bombs. Missed that bit, didn't you?
We are talking about bombs, not leaflets.
See, this is what I have been saying all along. You lot cherry pick any random article than vaguely backs up your position, but ignore anything that
I don't see what you mean.