David Hicks - Austrailian Terrorist captured, convicted and taking his case to the UN.

page: 6
6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 08:11 AM
link   
reply to post by Kryties
 


Oh im sorry I didnt realize that admitting I made a mistake is not allowed.

I will let you get back to walking on water and turning water into wine sine apparently you dont make mistakes.

Either way hicks decided to join al queida. Im not sure why, if a person joins a terrorist group and is captured, expects to be treated as if it were no big deal.




posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 08:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 



Either way hicks decided to join al queida. Im not sure why, if a person joins a terrorist group and is captured, expects to be treated as if it were no big deal.


Didn't the CIA just join with them in Libya ??

Oh shiz, are the CIA Aiding a "Known Terrorist Group" ??
Ain't that illegal mate???



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 08:14 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


My point is that you looked at the pictures and immediately saw what you wanted to see - Iraqi's torturing Iraqi's - therefore reinforcing your argument without using critical thinking. If you can make this mistake over a small issue like the photos, is it possible that you could be wrong about the wider issue of Hicks himself?
edit on 31/8/2011 by Kryties because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


My point is that you looked at the pictures and immediately saw what you wanted to see - Iraqi's torturing Iraqi's - therefore reinforcing your argument without using critical thinking. If you can make this mistake over a small issue like the photos, is it possible that you could be wrong about the wider issue of Hicks himself?
edit on 31/8/2011 by Kryties because: (no reason given)


Well, no I didnt see what I wanted to see. What I saw was a picture that I mistook for other photos on the net showing Iraqi military personell torturing Iraqis. Speaking of people only seeing what they want....

As far as Hicks goes elain your wider issue theory. He was a member of Al Queida, he received training in their camps, he made his way to Afghanistan, and in the process was captured.

As I said before they receive training on what to say if captured in order to cause problems. If he didnt want to be captured, charged and imprisoned, then dont join a terrorist organization.



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 03:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Xcathdra
 



Either way hicks decided to join al queida. Im not sure why, if a person joins a terrorist group and is captured, expects to be treated as if it were no big deal.


Didn't the CIA just join with them in Libya ??

Oh shiz, are the CIA Aiding a "Known Terrorist Group" ??
Ain't that illegal mate???


Good question - Research it and cite your sources to support your claim.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 01:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 



Good question - Research it and cite your sources to support your claim.


Do a search mate..
There's plenty of threads about it..

The US also admitted to giving money to the Taliban in Afghanistan remember..

so much for your "Material support to Terrorists" laws..



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


You're seeing what you want to see and hearing what you want to hear in order to reinforce your own circular argument.

Prove he was a terrorist - without a shadow of a doubt. Don't just say he was one because the US says he was.....PROVE IT.

Bet you can't......
edit on 1/9/2011 by Kryties because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:38 AM
link   
reply to post by Kryties
 



Don't just say he was one because the US says he was.....PROVE IT.


By US definition, EVERYONE is a terrorist..



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by backinblack
 


Because he was captured by the Northern Alliance while engaged in combat operations.

But by all emans continue the silly argument of he did nothing wrong and knaergoo court crap. The Northern Alliance should have ended his existance.


I heard he was in the back of a truck unarmed when captured..

But I'm sure you have pictures and everything to back up all your facts..

Oh wait, you ain't got any facts..
You have no idea of his exact movements were on or after the 26th October when the Patriot act was signed..

BTW, all the Norther Alliance cared about was the $1000..
They would have handed over Bambi for that much money..

8 pages of epic fail, still ZERO facts from you..


who in his right mind is where he was dude?

got any facts he was a pawn in the game of life, mongo?

u some kind of taliban?

sure sounds like a paid shill. what the heck is a shill, we used to call them traitors.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:47 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kryties
reply to post by Xcathdra
 


You're seeing what you want to see and hearing what you want to hear in order to reinforce your own, circular argument.

Prove he was a terrorist - without a shadow of a doubt. Don't just say he was one because the US says he was.....PROVE IT.

Bet you can't......


prove he wasn't.



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by backinblack

By US definition, EVERYONE is a terrorist..


Yep, probably including both of us



posted on Sep, 1 2011 @ 03:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by fooks


prove he wasn't.


The accusation is against him, making the burden of proof fall upon those who make the claim of terrorism.

Personally, I can't wait to see the truth come out at the U.N.





new topics
top topics
 
6
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join