It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by whiteblack
English isn't my first language, sorry.
I am asking this question because I have been wondering what is more worse asteriod hit on land or water. I am talking about the size of half mile long. Half mile long asteriod might not wipe out life on earth. A mile long of asteriod will definitely wipe out life on earth either hit on water or land. I think hitting on land is way worse than water. The debris will spread all over the world which will block most of sunlight. That cause temperature drops and different weather. The crops will struggle to grow because it need energy from sun. Now, if asteriod hit on water, all we will see is tsunami and debris spread on the ocean and land. The nuclear reactors on the shore by oceans can get ugly as well.
Which do you think is more worse half mile asteriod hit on land or water?
Originally posted by Buddha1098
reply to post by whiteblack
Find out for yourself
impact.ese.ic.ac.uk...
It may be a toss-up, but there are different hazards with an ocean impact.
Originally posted by whiteblack
Which do you think is more worse half mile asteriod hit on land or water?
The results of the simulations showed the 1 km asteroid could affect an area over 1000 km in diameter, and vast quantities of water and vapor would be ejected up to 160 km high. The scientists say the water vapor would contain chlorine and bromine from the vaporized sea salts, and this would result in significant global depletion of the ozone layer by destroying it faster than it is created naturally. Pierazzo said such an asteroid would produce “an ozone hole that will engulf the entire Earth,” and produce a huge spike in ultraviolet (UV) radiation with levels higher than anywhere on the surface today.