It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Doax919
its just a thought i had earlier and i wanted peoples opinion and possible evidence or theories i mean this could all just be one big test for every individual or the human race as a whole. i don't know thinking about is makes my brain hurt.
your argument is flawed because nothing is truly knowable.
what is the point of anything? there is great value in questioning the world.
life is about being happy, and philosophical questions bring happiness to some.
there is more to life than practicality. actually, i would say many times practicality limits beauty.
what is the point of art or music? so you can make money to get better (and completely arbitrary) things, or to add some indefinable quality of emotion to life?
Research before you start a new thread. We expect new threads to add new data. You can get a LOT of feedback by visiting all the other threads on this topic!
Think about the ramifications of the idea a bit before you post. If your new thread doesn't contain new data then it should at least contain a new viewpoint on the old data. Something that's been thought through a bit.
So: Say life is basically just a simulation. Well, what "software" is generating this simulation? What "machine" is it running on? How much input do participants have in how the story plays out? And specifically: Is it possible for a being to invent a game, then turn around and start playing that game, and end up forgetting who invented it, thus becoming, essentially, "trapped" in it?
Originally posted by Neo_Serf
your argument is flawed because nothing is truly knowable.
Do you know this to be true?
what is the point of anything? there is great value in questioning the world.
Of course. But there is no point in asking questions that are impossible to answer, since the point of a question is to know its answer.
life is about being happy, and philosophical questions bring happiness to some.
Im with Aristotle on this one - true happiness is only attainable through truth, and truth is only knowable through rational and empirical philosophy.
there is more to life than practicality. actually, i would say many times practicality limits beauty.
Im not sure how youre using the term 'practicality' so I cant comment.
what is the point of art or music? so you can make money to get better (and completely arbitrary) things, or to add some indefinable quality of emotion to life?
Again Im a little confused as to what youre saying, so maybe you could provide some context, or site specifically what you disagree with in my post?
edit on 6-8-2011 by Neo_Serf because: (no reason given)
I humbly submit that you spend your precious brainpower on questions that can actually be verified as True/False instead of squandering your mind on untestable, unknowable and unverifiable mental jerkoffs.
there are absolutes, but no one can prove them.
how fast am i moving right now? there is no real all encompassing answer. relative to the floor and walls, i'm not moving at all, but relative to the sun i'm moving pretty fast. what should be the absolute we base everything off of? there isn't one that we can know, unless you believe in a god.
there are many reasons for asking questions. the OP's reason is the search for an answer and the experience it brings. everywhere is a destination, is it not?
happiness is chemically induced. plato's belief that everything here is a shadow of the true form holds true.
does knowing that thousands of people around the world are dying right now make you happy? that's truth, and its sad. truth is truth, it has many flavors, but only one color.
practicality is only asking questions that have definite answers. what is the point to art and music if only questions that have answers are worth asking? there is more to life than practical gains.
are the arts a pointless exercise, or is there value in the emotions they trigger? if i understand you right, they are the same type of waste as the OP's question.
simulation which would probably be way beyond our realm or perception
Are you implying that Im some sort of sadist? what impulse would lead you to ask if I find the pain and suffering of others to be pleasurable?
Nowhere did I state that emotions are meaningless in any way
That you hold Platos ramblings of forms and other imaginary and non empirical 'feelings' to be true