This is a piece of advice for ats members , and it is a piece of advice for an entire local community : Hampshire and notably Southampton , UK. My
piece of advice is also given to Police Investigators who have to satisfy the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS/in the UK) that sufficient evidence is
available to secure a conviction against the breaking of an actual law. By an actual person .
So the advice here follows, and beyond that a demonstration of just why this advice not only works in discovering the truth of an issue, especially
current or newsworthy events, but also a demonstartion of this approach has brought fruit in terms of actual example.
Carry out an investigation on this basis "Names and Faces" . It is a very simple approach , but it is highly effective . As you come accross
evidence relevant to the issues you are researching , note down those names and faces as you go . Also note down their employed positions/
locations/rough description if you need it ,but keep things simple , retaining only the pertinent or important facts as you gain evidence. Use a note
pad for "names and faces". and go back to working on this basis again and again as further facts or potential evidence come to light.
Now there has been a huge debate occuring across Southampton, where the local newspaper Daily Echo is involved , and there have been protests by
respectable citizens against this : fluoridation of Southampton's drinking water supply. Here's a recent explanatory link
:link to short news article
Put simply , 'certain members' of our community can and will fluoridate soon. Other members of the community, as in most of them , do not want
fluoridation at all. As in not one bit. Hence the players are described below :
The Southampton City Primary Care Trust (PCT)
The Southern Counties Strategic Health Authority (SHA)
The Southampton City Council (SCC)
Hampshire Against Fluoridation (HAF)
The General Public
The Daily Echo (Newsquest Media Group)
Now I will post the links and cut to the chase here : local residents can note for themselves the names and faces and I will note for ATS members who
they are .
Hampshire Against Fluoridation , one would hope , would represent people in Hamshire who dont want fluoride added to their water . But no. They have
been led a merry dance by guess who ? their leader , the chairman of HAF . People in Hampshire have even sent donations 'via paypal' to this
organisation who takes 'messages of support' from -local- people on his website. I'd tell his name but I have forgotten it .
The PCT , are the one who had this 'great idea' in the first place. They are the real criminals here , using their' care' of our children as an
exuse, to make everyone drink poisons. Our children's teeth to be exact . But the freedom of information act , used by a certain lady, dont know who
she is , to expose exactly what they are playing at . And we are disgusted. Enough said.
The SHA . These are like the 12 'deputies' the PCT called in to legitimate and ultimately enforce the plan. Now most people know that this issue is
a massive breach of human rights and pretty much illegal except for taking advantage of Labour governments acts of parliament allowing the decision to
mass medicate the population .Not only that the SHA who implements this plan have ignored the evidence, broken the guidelines, they act like and are
nazis hell bent on enforcement.
Southampton City Council can do nothing about it , the SHA are mucher 'harder' than them . HAF c laimed a small 'victory' when they gathered a
petition to get the issue discussed for 15 whole minutes at one of their daily sesssions. Arent the HAF great ?
The Daily Echo , has taken and published peoples comments, the events, in some detail but not enough. What is critical we know is "names and faces"
but they know that too. The general public has sounded their opinion> overwhelmingly against , even according to SHA figures. But ahead they are
going, while the daily Echo weakly announces it. Not weekly - weakly.
The general public then , are left to form their alliances because they are democratic citizens who want something done. But what has been done : not
nearly enough > next to nothing at all, by the very chairman of the organisation formed to oppose it. And I am going to level here : it's because he
is one of them. Names and Faces remember : and whoworks
for the PCT ?
Who now is it, that collects the information , at point source , all the details, all the arguments put , all the names and faces ? Who is it who
takes their donations from them ?
A great spokesman who has nearly won ? Or a lazy fraudulent liar who is a closet medico-nazi child molester - like the rest of them. ?
Or was it this worthless worm who is the chairman of HAF?
Well I'll tell you : names and faces , thats what you need to know. Watching the videos of the SHA consultation meeting February 2009 (national
archives link)national archives link (not video)
says it all about Nazi behaviour and how their plans are made. : get every name and face you can if you live there , because they belong in
And never end with your questions ?
So ; why is thevideo mentioned above not available from HAF website anymore? More to the point, why , are the pages which propose you can watch it ,
mirrored with other things on google results, other 'updates' rather than the original evidence? Why since searching the site today, has it been
removed ? We do wonder.
Here's a link to HAF page which says it is about this video but it is not. Saying that I have just had a call from Southern Water > can you beleive
it ? I can : but you dont scare us Nazis _get off our world.
Hampshire Against Fluoridation?