It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Names and Faces : Breaking Nazi Plans Wide Open : Hampshire AGAINST Fluoridation In The Dock !

page: 2
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 4 2011 @ 11:35 AM
link   
fluoride calcifies your third eye (pineal gland)

dont let them kill your third eye.




posted on Aug, 4 2011 @ 05:58 PM
link   
reply to post by Ittabena
 


Thank you for your contribution . The production is certainly a valuable asset in ascertaining the origins of fluoride, leading a winding path through the MIC, power producers, heavy industry , agriculture, pharmacuetical and manufacturing industry , transport infrastructure, and others. The end result of the need for corrupt dealing is in nonsense from our own medical 'professionals'.
The SCPCT itself then is the end user of the 'corrupt route to power' and is itself being a host to the PTB who control the districts over the localities. The tool is not the hand of the artist , hence the local names and faces are where the actual buck stops. We have to then make sure we dont lose sight of that . You dont attack the SHA to get this problem dealt with, you find those sitting at home in your own city , foolish enough to sponsor a plan like this with their own names and faces. Before they further stupidfy the populace.
Then you take the matter , en masse , to the Police. They dont act , unless there is an upheld complaint. You get a lawyer to identify the list of complaints. Now you are leading a winding path through the prevention of terrorism act, (PTA) the serious fraud office (SFO), serious organised crime department (SOC) also CO19 (THE FLYING SQUAD) , to Scotland Yard. (Where you find police chiefs already under arrest, as of today's headlines.)
.No complaint> no inquiry. No evidence> no case . No name and face > no culprits. No law > no crime .
No investigation > no charges.
Names and Faces > this is how we all have to work. We make sure we dont play the games of the PC T and start pandering to the SHA. All they are is as cogs in a machine, predictable like clockwork. It only needs a large 'wedge' stuck in between them if you know what I mean. I will second the people of southampton and their children > stop these nazi monsters on behalf of the world. Their animals and aquatic life to boot. Tell it NO, in Southampton. And across the pond



posted on Aug, 4 2011 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by thoughtsfull
reply to post by ZIPMATT
 


You forgot the other player in this, Southern Water

or should I say J.P.Morgan via the Greensands Consortium who beat off a rival bid from Goldman Sachs

www.guardian.co.uk...


Thanks. But you dont keep all of your armory on show. They are to be receptors of NHS budget, so we stay facing the names of the wrongdoers who will control them. What is written in the OP about Southern Water was not made up. For anyone else, if you dont think your current broadband provider can also provide a 'fluoridation service' direct to your home, think again. Or call 0800 247-999 (Homeserve) for a connection. How we just love private companies in the free market . All those delicious payoffs . A specialised police unit is assigned to Southern Water / matter of National Security / 24/7@Otterbourne. And we know who Olly The Otter is .



posted on Aug, 4 2011 @ 07:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by EnlightenMe2012
reply to post by ZIPMATT
 


Stephen Peckham speaking at the SHA meeting at St. Mary's Stadium, Southampton, Feb 2009

"I appreciate the importance of the decision being made here. I mean I have sat in the same position as a PCT non executive for southampton PCT when this decision originally came up, and know as a board member you have to be very clear about the nature of the evidence and the arguments for and against in order to make a decision."

www.youtube.com...=719
Starts from about 11.40
edit on 4-8-2011 by EnlightenMe2012 because: spelling mistake


His admission went straight to topical idealism. It's excuses all the way.

What you need to be clear about in reality is exactly

what substance is being used (aka industrial waste fluoride direct from smokestack scrubbers, not high grade sodium fluoride at all)

why it is being used (medico-nazi direct populus pollution experiment/Southampton Project) and

where it is going to be released ( at what strength at which points in the system) .

And most importantly of of all : WHO is going to do so. When and how should be more than explicit too.

When the act takes place the perpetrators will be arrested. That's on a nod and a wink.



posted on Aug, 5 2011 @ 03:13 AM
link   
reply to post by ZIPMATT
 


Sorry for butting in to your thread the way I did, I just have a hatred for Southern Water.. *shakes fist*

All the numpty nonsense and lies they come out with... how they have to charge us more due to their self deluded facts that we have less water than the average Syrian..

*rant* I live over the Brighton block that is said to have enough water to last the country not just the South a few hundred years!!! *rant*

My gut says they will charge us to fluoridate our water against our will *shakes fist*



posted on Aug, 5 2011 @ 05:27 AM
link   
reply to post by thoughtsfull
 


Any contribution is welcomed. Your points about actual water availablility may be very valid ; the water in the south is very pure, filtered through limestone and chalk into aquifers rising at about 65 metres at it's emergence points in North Hampshire. Extraction and export may be very important business in the future> very lucrative too. Fluoridation also brings the opportunity to secretise and securitise the operation . They may also be building freshwater extraction facilities for their comet shelters/underground bunkers. Potentially safer than storing a breachable reservoir within the units, given the earthquake factor. We keep an open mind wherever we walk. Southern Water, the liquid product , has certainly got a lot of flies around it at the moment. They are laying eggs in it.



posted on Aug, 5 2011 @ 06:49 AM
link   
I applaud all the efforts you're making to fight this and it's such a vital fight.

I don't know how much public support the anti-flouridation body has - but if it's significant, as I suspect it is, perhaps you need to start fighting this on different fronts and not just on their terms according to the 'statutes' of their system.

You've probably thought of all of these already, but I'm just sharing some thoughts that come to mind:

Get as much national support as possible. Perhaps publish the details of who people outside Hampshire can contact to voice their outrage at what's going on and their support for you.

Mass non-payment of countil tax and water rates might be worth considering, if you haven't already done so.

Votes of no confidence in the Council / implicated local MP's.

Scrutnise the legal issues and press charges against them as well....it's not just about defending your rights but about putting them in the hot seat, ie in a position of having to legally defend themselves against you, the plaintiffs. Keep as many of them as possible tied up with defending themselves.

Set up your own tribunals, like Kevin Annett has done with the ITCCS

Sit-ins as local protests.

It's a game of chess and it ain't over till the fat lady sings.

Remember - they are simply a tiny dot compared to you:








edit on 5-8-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)

edit on 5-8-2011 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 5 2011 @ 10:43 AM
link   
reply to post by wcitizen
 


Thanks for this
and the video. I like how it starts so simple and ends with the ultra-lengthy paranoid statements from the dot. Just as we hear everyday.

While I would like to see them behind bars, I admot, I would just remind that it is not their law which originated in the 10 Commandments : thou shalt not bear false witness .

Its up there with murder and theft. Now when you are talking about actual purposeful poisoning, which needs to be clear that that is what is the 'difference' between the Southampton Project and normal fluoridation as in spain or italy, or even America , then you're into a different ball park all together, as well. Protesting that situation is a dangerous activity > what we have now got is what they have gathered : actual IDs.

I appreciate your input in terms of suggested courses of action . To add a few other ways to defeat it to this thread on the flip side we can also consider extraction and treatment of our own drinking water supply , independent of Southern Water. There is nothing stopping us using known technology/ biology/ sample science to avoid fluoride contamination through water altogether, since most of us at least in Hampshire are close to sites where exactly this takes place. A settlement tank, flood and drain/ bio/particle filter (clay pebbles etc) plus a charcoal filter create water fit for drinking without chemicals or boiling> good water too. A small scale system is actually cheap and easy to make and run, except for the costs of importing the raw material. But what in life is more important than clean fresh water (3L a day) for drinking , also cooking washing cleaning etc.
We can also reprioritise our entire ways of life on water itself ; bringer and sustainer of animal vegetable and mineral. You can replace entire the entire system on understanding of the basic connective bonds between water and health. We live with death all around us while water can always bring again life.



posted on Aug, 5 2011 @ 11:48 AM
link   


Slowly slowly catchee monkey



posted on Aug, 8 2011 @ 12:57 PM
link   


Slowly slowly catchee monkey


Parvin Damani MBE

Masters degree in Health Promotion and a Counselling Diploma
Elected as a Labour Councillor on Southampton City Council in 1996
Mayor of Southampton during 2003 / 2004
Now a public health specialist for the Strategic Health Authority at Southampton City NHS

This lady has worked with many organisations and appears to be very influential.

Is she still being investigated as the report in the daily echo is dated 2009?
www.dailyecho.co.uk...

Thanks for not actually putting her picture up.



posted on Aug, 12 2011 @ 07:48 AM
link   



posted on Aug, 12 2011 @ 08:11 AM
link   
council names and faces

lol yeah posting that pic would be offensive
Making headway here ^ though . Report coming on FOIA factors.
She knows what is being put in and why.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<< 1   >>

log in

join