Global warming: study finds natural shields being weakened. Here we go!

Global warming: study finds natural shields being weakened.

The soil and the ocean are being weakened as buffers against global warming, in a vicious circle with long-term implications for the climate system, say two new investigations.

If the seas and the land are less able to soak up or store greenhouse gases, more of these carbon emissions will enter the atmosphere, holding in even more heat from the sun.

A study published in Nature on Thursday says a gradual increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) over the last half-century has accelerated the release of methane and nitrous oxide in the soil.

These gases are respectively 25 and 300 times more effective at trapping radiation than CO2, the principal greenhouse gas by volume.

"This feedback to our changing atmosphere means that nature is not as efficient in slowing global warming as we previously thought," said Kees Jan van Groenigen, a professor at Trinity College Dublin and the paper's lead author.

Source:

news.yahoo.com...

So here's more evidence that we are in for an even more increase in temps due to global warming. Now it sounds like it will be increasing even more rapidly as well. This sounds pretty scary to say the least, but I'm getting used to it by now.

Question is: Just how hot will things get before they get better?

Where are all the hurricanes that Global Warming was suppose to usher in?

I'm sure we will have a couple this year (like every year), but it sure looks like the hurricane cycle is in a decline.

You know climate has cycles....don't you? Man has absolutely nothing to do with that.

imo, global warming is BS.

thought people knew that as old news

3rd...

How come the global cooling guys are the ones that get their weather predictions right
while the warmists NEVER do?

"The originators of this data are the same people and organizations who were caught fiddling data in the ‘ClimateGate’ affair,” said Piers. "The various whitewash enquiries arranged to cover-up their vandalisation of the scientific method cannot dodge the question:...
... · WHY is there a statistically highly significant systematic inverse relationship between the number of stations they selected for ‘official’ use and the average temperatures resulting? What average temperature would result from the 62% of stations they removed since around the 1960s - which had the coldest temperature averages and the highest number of stations - up to the present decade - which is officially the warmest and has the least number of stations? Anyone with a brain can see that this systematic connection means that either temperature is magically determined by the number of stations or there has been systematic selecting of data which is best described as data fraud”, said Piers. "This question requires an international inquiry which is independent of any of the organizations involved in this data creation.

www.weatheraction.com...


Ps east anglia the "climate gate" specialists hired a PR firm linked to rupert murdoc to spread global warming lies to boost the chances the the carbon taxes agenda of "Blood and Gore" ( my god..haha) was reamed through...
like it has been in Australia....where Murdork is from...no?

How can we believe anything these "studies" say? They have been proven to be frauds who create data for more money to study this pseudo science

Originally posted by Carseller4


You know climate has cycles....don't you? Man has absolutely nothing to do with that.

No, man did not create natures cycles. But to imply that human actions have no bearing on climate cycles is incorrect, to say the least.

Where are all the hurricanes that Global Warming was suppose to usher in?

"Supposed to'? According to who? Under what time frame? Can you site these claims?

I'm sure we will have a couple this year (like every year), but it sure looks like the hurricane cycle is in a decline.

Really, a decline? Based on what sort of time frame?

Originally posted by isitjustme
How can we believe anything these "studies" say? They have been proven to be frauds who create data for more money to study this pseudo science

It's a testament to the deep pockets of the petrol industry that such false claims are perpetuated with such frequency and popularity.

Please, provide the evidence that has 'proven' decades of information collected by literally tens of thousands of scientists from around the world. There is none, of course. Just opinion and speculation, no science.