It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Societalgnorance
*DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN, NOR AM I A DEMOCRAT. I DON'T SUPPORT THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SYSTEM, AND I HAVE NO POLITICAL AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER*
Back in 2008, when the U.S. Presidential Election campaigns were in full swing, there were several "gaffes" or "mistakes" that Republican V.P. nominee Sarah Palin took some heat for. These scandals ultimately cost the McCain/Palin ticket the election, and made one Barack Obama look all the more electable.
The controlling elite know that Barack Obama can bring them a one-world government, or at least bring them a few steps closer, and they need another four years to complete a few more objectives. Obama and Brezinksi didn't stack the Administration with all their buddies only to get booted out of office after their first term. He's good for Wall Street, and the Military-Industrial Complex hasn't exactly suffered since Bush left office.
Folks, Michelle Bachmann is your new Sarah Palin, and she will utlimately cost the Republicans the 2012 Presidential Election. I could list dumb quote after dumb quote, but if you're lurking this forum, you probably have heard them already.
Originally posted by Societalgnorance
reply to post by jam321
Well, you can say that a potential VP nominee doesn't effect your vote, and that's your opinion, you have that right. But I would have to add that Sarah Palin dominated the news headlines, and was clearly in the public eye more than McCain. IMO, she effected the outcome of the election way more than McCain, and I've spoken with several Republican strategists who have conceded that Palin cost them the election. Her "gaffes" were the topic of choice for the media, instead of debating policy and comparing the candidates, it seemed like we were bombarded with Palin mistakes and questions surrounding her credibility.
Originally posted by Societalgnorance
reply to post by beezzer
But don't you get it?
Obama serves the Agenda.
Say Bachmann gets elected. She will then serve the same agenda.
You need to learn how the political hierarchy works in this country. The real power is not within a President.
The POTUS serves the real power. It is not a conspiracy. During the younger Bush's regime, everyone hated the Republicans
and were dying to vote in a Democrat. Like magic, this young, handsome, African-American, Ivy School educated, smooth-talking Democratic Party superstar comes out of nowhere and is the "obvious solution" to the problems facing the United States. Oh, and by the way, Zbigniew Brezinski was his mentor at Harvard, and is one of his top Advisors in his administration. What a coincedence!
Now he's serving the same agenda Bush did, and everyone wants to attack the Democrats and vote in Bachmann, or whoever the hot ticket is at the moment.
What makes you think things will change in Washington if Bachmann is elected?
Originally posted by beezzer
But instead of focusing on the negative, you need to start on the positive atributes of say Bachmann, because if she wins the primary then she will be our only hope to defeat the Obama regime.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
They just pay attention to her issues, or get involved in another candidate so that doesn't happen.
Easy.
Originally posted by Societalgnorance
So let me get this straight, if I don't support either of the two corrupt political parties that are being forced-fed to me, I'm somehow on a lunatic fringe? Is that what you're implying?
Originally posted by beezzer
Everyone STILL hates the republicans!