It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Operation Anti-Security (launched by Lulzsec)

page: 2
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 08:29 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


i support no one but my fellow man. that would include you, my friend.



But i will not cower, nor will I wring my hands. I have loyalty to myself, and to humanity. Anything else is guaranteed to meet my vengeance.




posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 08:32 AM
link   
Those dudes have been doxed and know their time is running out.

Kinda sucks.

Lulzsec == Anon so it doesn't surprise me that they work together.

Hell, being Monday, they will probably get the raid today.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 08:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Jeanius
CIA hackers launch another fake attack on themselves and blame it on a group called "anonymous".

Soon to be web security act strengthened by this "act of defiance" which will be answered by laws and china like internet.

I love how israel shows up as spelled wrong if you don't capitalize it, but china firefox doesn't care seem to care as much about. lol


Anon and lulzsec are 2 different entities neither of which are the CIA lol



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 08:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

i support no one but my fellow man. that would include you, my friend.

But i will not cower, nor will I wring my hands. I have loyalty to myself, and to humanity. Anything else is guaranteed to meet my vengeance.


Texan,
I am just trying to warn people not to take what
they read and hear on the internet as gospel.
There are many Psy-Ops going on simultaneously.

America is like a big Oak Tree.

It has to be chopped down,
one swing at a time.

Do not trust every tid-bit you hear or read
about hacker groups.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 08:37 AM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


i will not disagree with that.

believe nothing that you read. the CIA is releasing "press releases" all the time.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 09:12 AM
link   
I've always supported anyone who stood up for human rights or societal freedoms, but with these guys it's a confusing mess anymore. Whether they're infiltrated or not, I think that the possibility of infiltration has weakened their overall support. Trustworthy information is such a rare thing these days, and perhaps the only one's that have it are the members themselves; maybe...



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 09:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by BarmyBilly
reply to post by purplemer
 


Why does everyone think this is the CIA i mean EVERYTHING that goes in favour of the people has to be the CIA.

Lulzec and anonymous are genuine.
edit on 20/6/2011 by BarmyBilly because: (no reason given)


I wasnt saying they were CIA, personaly I think they are the real deal and protest has is just taking on different forms....



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 11:41 AM
link   
reply to post by purplemer
 


yep, its like everybody whos supporting the cyber protest is an agent provocateur...pretty paranoid
edit on 20-6-2011 by Hessdalen because: mindcontrol



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 12:46 PM
link   
i think these groups are genuine, even though our government does use false flags.. i dont think that they will succeed though because hacking the government, banks etc. is "cyber terror" aka crime



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 10:37 PM
link   
Unusual stenciled graffiti on Mission Beach boardwalk (Antisec)


SAN DIEGO (CBS 8) - A serial graffiti artist is tagging local beaches.

People living near Mission Beach say the unusual graffiti first appeared last week on the boardwalk.

It was quickly painted over, but the stenciled words (Antisec - poster) were back Monday morning. It's unclear what the words mean.

Lifeguards say they haven't received any formal complaints.

Anyone with information should call police.


Classic CBS8 fail. The comments are fantastic, there must be some red faces over there:


Good grief, how hard is it to figure out what this means. Are these people actually paid journalists?



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 10:55 PM
link   
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
 


Keep an eye on the site in the next 12 hours or so. Apparently they're preparing the first plunder from AntiSec. From twitter:


LulzSec The Lulz Boat
Our next step is to categorize and format leaked items we acquire and release them in #AntiSec "payloads" on our website and The Pirate Bay.
11 minutes ago



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by TheStev
 


wanna take bets that whoever downloads those files will end up with a rootkit? Better use Linux if you are going to get them.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 11:06 PM
link   
I'm still too paranoid to actually 'follow' their twitter feed, even though I read it regularly!

I'll check out what's on offer, but probably won't actually download anything. If I do I'll just download at work



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 11:16 PM
link   
I find it funny how a tweet can create a huge story in the Washington Post.

www.washingtonpost.com... GdH_story.html



Hackers claim attack on FBI partner organization in Connecticut, declare ‘war’ on governments


And this story is about a tweet that did not even come from Lulzsec but from one of there followers.



campyspornshackcampylobacter
by LulzSec
@FBIPressOffice Infragard Connecticut got hacked by @LulzSec via a primitive SQL injection? Your security is a JOKE. I want my tax $$$ back.
19 Jun


You never know what to trust these days.

Heres the Associated Press saying the Infraguard site was shut down on Monday. To bad the post on Twitter was from Sinday.

hosted.ap.org...



The online collective Lulz Security said it attacked a local section of InfraGard, a partnership between the FBI and the private sector to share security information. Connecticut InfraGard's website was down Monday afternoon.

edit on 20-6-2011 by JBA2848 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 11:20 PM
link   
I wont post a link to the actual user database, but LulzSec did in fact hack Infraguard (except it was Atlanta not Connecticut), and posted a whole bunch of user accounts on the site:


Infragard Atlanta users database

lulzsecurity.com... (On 03/06/11)



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 11:24 PM
link   
reply to post by TheStev
 


What I posted was about a new attack on Connecticut Infragaurd.
I don't think its true but it make for a good story I guess.
All from a one liner of a tweet. The little birdy said it it must be true.



posted on Jun, 20 2011 @ 11:31 PM
link   
Right, my apologies, I couldn't get your link to work so I wasn't sure whether the article was referring to Connecticut or Atlanta. Here is the link again, I'm hoping it works better within a URL tag.


The online collective Lulz Security said it attacked a local section of InfraGard, a partnership between the FBI and the private sector to share security information. Connecticut InfraGard’s website was down Monday afternoon.

The FBI was aware of the attack and that the website had been shut down as a precaution, agency spokeswoman Jenny Shearer said. She declined to comment on the extent of any damage.

Lulz tweeted Sunday night that its Connecticut attack had “compromised 1000+ FBI-affiliated members.” The group said it would not leak the user information but would embarrass the FBI with “simple hacks.” It did not provide details on the information it said was compromised.


I do know that Lulz said that last week's 'Swear FBI Friday' was productive, and that although much was gained they weren't actually going to release anything. Maybe I missed some tweets on Saturday, but after trying to get 1500 people to join their chat channel they tweeted that they were taking the weekend off. I'd love to see some sources (beyond AP) to support this story.

AP do definitely seem to claim a lot more info beyond just the tweet, but I don't know where they're getting this info from. I can't imagine LulzSec making any statements that don't also appear on their twitter feed and website, and I've seen no claims of an attack on Infraguard Connecticut.

This is definitely getting stranger.
edit on 20-6-2011 by TheStev because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 07:25 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 25 2011 @ 07:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by nowanmai
Why arresting lulzsec won’t change anything

'Nuff said.


The article adopts a naively idealistic slant when considering the intentions of groups such as these.

LulzSec have no ethical stance which contributes towards their activities. The members of the group are after attention, notoriety, self-affirmation, revenge and financial gain.

They've bitten off more than they could chew, and I think that they just want to go out in a blaze of glory.



posted on Jun, 26 2011 @ 09:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Sherlock Holmes
 


They, themselves, may have no ethical stance, but I'm hoping, that at least some of their new gained allies will/do have some. Surely, I may be wrong. Doesn't matter. What matters is, they've made the ball roll. And, I hope, it will continue to.
Anyway, I'll stop now, seeing, how I've tried to write this reply far too many times being a little intoxicated. National holiday just a little ago. So, there you have it.
Good day, good sirs!




top topics



 
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join