It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
No witnesses said they thought the explosions were explosives thats's just your opinion, some even came forward saying they were upset that conspiracy theorists would twist their words to fit their claim... but you present facts? Nice try lol
When the fireman in this video says that "this ain't done yet, any one of these buildings could explode", he is talking about explosives. What else could he be talking about?
Originally posted by MasterAndrew
Also OP pops up on all 9/11 threads spreading disinfo. all my construction friends and engineers would have him burbling his words if we had a real debate about all this.
Originally posted by Buford2
reply to post by MindfulReason
If you find that out PLEASE let everyone know. I wondered why people cannot see the dust instead of thousands of pounds of steel crushing down. What caused the building to turn to dust and what caused the huge explosions in the basement that turned steel into lava. What do they have that we do not know about? What type of weopon can turn a Tower into dust? Not sure if we will ever know since most are concerned with terrorist and flying jets into buildings. The entire event was a ritual to bring in the NWO but I would like to know what type of weapon was used. Remember when Papa Bush called for the NWO on Sept 11, 1990? His Son GW brought in the beginning of a long battle. I am sure people will say this was just some terrorist from caves and their abilities to overcome the most powerful Government on this planet. They may try to explain away Papa Bush and all the references of 911 in movies, music, TV and other well hidden places. This is nothing more than a movie yet so many believed every aspect of the story was real. The destruction was real just like the destruction of the Gulf Oil spill which was shown a year before it happened in the movie Knowing. The Elite do not lie to us. they do not hand feed us either. They have a role to play and although they seem mean and dangerous as hell they have a purpose. Something tells me the ending will be good. Order out of Chaos is their motto.edit on 19-6-2011 by Buford2 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Originally posted by VirtualTech
If you think that there was no foul-play on 9/11 then you are sheep.
Resorting to name calling and conspiracy theory movie references to prove you're point logically, typical truther. Plus have you not seen the most recent debate with Loose Change with Popular Mechanics? The LC guys even said not to watch their video because it was full of holes and dubious claims and to watch 911: Press for Truth. so why reference a move that not even the makes of it agree with anymore? And I probably saw Loose Change and Zeitgeist way before you, so please go home with that #.
Originally posted by SkepticAndBeliever
Originally posted by MasterAndrew
Also OP pops up on all 9/11 threads spreading disinfo. all my construction friends and engineers would have him burbling his words if we had a real debate about all this.
Ya because construction workers know more than the experts NIST hired? Quit spreading disinfo and lying out your teeth to prove your outdated debunked theories that the SCIENTIFIC community laughs at lol @ construction workers, what a sham.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
60% of the people who compiled the nist report alluded to a coverup.
I was a welder on a powerplant. We have the real knowledge, who do u think reads all the blueprints, measures everthing out and accounts for heat distortion? Some guy in an office? We have practical knowledge.
If its so debunked, I've been waiting almost 7 pages for you to explain the heat/molten metal. You ignore whatever doesn't fit with your theory, including numbers and basic physics.
Your agenda couldn't be more clear.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
60% of the people who compiled the nist report alluded to a coverup.
I was a welder on a powerplant. We have the real knowledge, who do u think reads all the blueprints, measures everthing out and accounts for heat distortion? Some guy in an office? We have practical knowledge.
If its so debunked, I've been waiting almost 7 pages for you to explain the heat/molten metal. You ignore whatever doesn't fit with your theory, including numbers and basic physics.
Your agenda couldn't be more clear.
Originally posted by esdad71
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by SkepticAndBeliever
60% of the people who compiled the nist report alluded to a coverup.
I was a welder on a powerplant. We have the real knowledge, who do u think reads all the blueprints, measures everthing out and accounts for heat distortion? Some guy in an office? We have practical knowledge.
If its so debunked, I've been waiting almost 7 pages for you to explain the heat/molten metal. You ignore whatever doesn't fit with your theory, including numbers and basic physics.
Your agenda couldn't be more clear.
First, name the 60% percent. You cannot becaus that is complete and utter BS. Next, there is a big difference between reading blueprints and then applying as opposed to designing those blueprints you will read. Yes, a guy in the office may very well have more practical knowledge and to think that ANY welder has more knowledge than an architect is ignorant. Do some welders have that knowledge, and have they pointed out flaws, yes, but your example is too broad.
Heat and molten metal. You are a welder, right? Have you ever heard of a process called smelting? What is left...Think about it. The fires at the 9/11 site lasted for months. Do you really think that there would be no molten steel after all of that time, especially in the lower floors.
BTW, I was a fabrication welder for 2 years (MIG and TIG) as well as a student long ago regarding strcutural blueprints so I understand your point but it was incorrect.
Originally posted by Averysmallfoxx
reply to post by esdad71
you really don't understand his point because there is no way an architect knows more about welding...THAN A WELDER. does architecture recquire metallurgy degrees? No. Maybe engineering background,likely but not expert standard degrees because that woukd make him an engineer not an architect,metallurgy is not the expertise of architects abd your just stretching your exaggerated expertise to satisfy your need to be right. No guy in an office knows metal better than the guy working with it. you have your roles flipped. an architect may have some experience in metallurgy but not comparable to a tradesmith and everyone knows that,oh except for you that is.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
Your agenda couldn't be more clear.
Exactly. 4 days registered and almost 400 posts? Almost all trying to debunk the "inside job" theory and a little "believe it was really Osama". Paid Shill? Does that really happen? If it does, this would be our guy.