Why would the demolition need to begin at the ground floor ?

In a conventional demolition that is how it is done but this,
if it is a demolition, was anything but conventional.

If "I" were planning this type of event I would have it set up
so that I could trigger demolition on any floor because I
could not be certain where the planes would impact.

Explain Bldg 7. That is the start, middle and end of the debate. If that ONE building can be explained by natural forces and occurrence through the events of that morning, then all the theories fall apart. If however, it cannot be explained as a cause/effect of two planes hitting Bldg 1 and 2, then it's all a load of crap. It's really that simple and that cut and dry.

So..... Explain Bldg 7.

Originally posted by MasterAndrew
you are deluded. ever heard of physics. Look it up.

No offense but if you continue to think the weren't demolished. It just proves they could rely on how gullible people like you are.

Ever heard of gravity? Look it up.....I Swear some people believe every outrages theory they believe on the internet like a drone.

Originally posted by MasterAndrew
you are deluded. ever heard of physics. Look it up.

No offense but if you continue to think the weren't demolished. It just proves they could rely on how gullible people like you are.

And at least I show diagrams for my claims, you just hide behind the word "physics" lol What a load of delusional crap.

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Explain Bldg 7. That is the start, middle and end of the debate. If that ONE building can be explained by natural forces and occurrence through the events of that morning, then all the theories fall apart. If however, it cannot be explained as a cause/effect of two planes hitting Bldg 1 and 2, then it's all a load of crap. It's really that simple and that cut and dry.

So..... Explain Bldg 7.

I'm talking about the twin towers not building 7, stay on topic young grasshopper (even thought building 7 didn't need explosives either).

I entirely agreed about the 'truthers' being a little nuts and a whole bunch to avoid..until I actually watched the video taken that day of Bldg 7 going down. Before I actually watched it with my own Mark I eyeballs, I figured it was all a crock. When I saw that, I cannot say anything but, controlled implosion demolition. Period. There IS NO other way to describe it. So.. like I said.., Explain that and everything else falls apart. If that cannot be explained..and I've yet to hear one...then everything is in play about what happened that day. Period. That is just a fact of life...both directions. If someone cuts my way to prove me wrong, I'll thank them and buy 'em a beer. I want ANY other explanation, as the obvious one is the LAST ONE I ever want to accept as an American... I just don't see another way to view it.

Did planes hit the towers? Yes. Did those planes go in with Jihadis screaming Allahua Akhbar? Yes. Did they swear allegiance to Bin Laden? Hell yes. Twice, in fact. However...the fact the Hijackers WERE AQ fighters does nothing to explain a dozen other issues about the events of that day that don't track. Kinda like every water tight door on every ship in Pearl Haror being wide open in direct contradiction of Naval procedure on Dec 7th, 1941. It's a matter of whether TPTB had an interest in letting events take their natural course, once aware of things being well in progress.....and the benefit that NOT interferring with it would carry.

When FDR did it, it was the RIGHT thing to do. If he hadn't let Japan kick our butt at Pearl, we would have been faced with no ally left alive in the World when Japan and Germany decided to meet somewhere around Kansas, USA to split what was left of the world. In 2001 though? This was EVIL... EVIL in the Religious sense. There is no other way to put it and that IS what *I* believe happened. Al Qaeda damn sure did it...but others suspected or KNEW..and let it play out...and may they burn in the pits of hell.

And lets not forget the actual witnesses that specifically state that the twin towers had explosions in their basements PRIOR to the planes ever hitting the buildings....plus larry silverstien admitting he called for building 7 to be pulled..funny thing is, is it takes a week or 2 to prep a building to be pulled, so now you know who was behind it

WAKE UP PEOPLE QUIT BEING NAIVE

Originally posted by ANOK
You are not taking into account the laws of motion that govern all objects in movement and what happens to them when subjected to other forces.

But the mass of the bottom of the tower doesn't have the force of gravity pushing it towards anything like the top does.

If you think that there was no foul-play on 9/11 then you are sheep. Period. Watch the countless documentaries like loose change 1 & 2, zeitgiest, ect.. There is no possible way that the events that were told by the MSM are accurate. As for the building 7 topic, it was already admitted that building 7 was intentionally brought down by the owner (Larry Silverstein) because of "excessive fire damage".