It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
If people take care of each other without government assistance they cannot be effectively controlled or directed as the state deems necessary. The state requires dependency on the central government. It has been reported that 39% of the populace is dependent on food stamps for survival. Can anyone think of a better way for the Marxists to control a larger segment of the population?
Originally posted by GhostLancer
My knee-jerk reaction is just like most everyone here. After emotions are set aside, I have to ask, what is the law, why was it passed? How did such a law get passed, --one stating you can't feed a group of beggars/homeless? Is it just for this POSH part of Orlando or for ALL of Orlando?
We all know that Orlando DEPENDS on tourist dollars to thrive and survive, right? If tourists visit and see a bunch of homeless, then they won't be likely to return... which means LESS TOURIST DOLLARS PUMPED INTO THE LOCAL ECONOMY. Which means PEOPLE LOSE JOBS.
So, while the "don't feed the homeless" law seems inhumane, it seems to be in place to ensure that tourists keep coming back. In other words, homeless beggars will keep MONEY-SPENDING tourists from returning as often as Orlando NEEDS THEM TO RETURN. If tourists don't return, then hard-working people lose jobs. By encouraging homeless beggars, people might be destroying the local economy?
I'm trying to see it from the city coucil view. But, it's hard to say whether or not feeding the homeless around resort areas will keep tourists from visiting.
HERE IS A QUESTION: If, while visiting on vacation, a large group of homeless surrounded your VACATION, would you be more or less likely to return to Orlando for another vacation? It's tough to answer.
Originally posted by Marked One
Too bad. People, homeless or not, need to stop being lazy and work. And if it takes sending someone to jail to send a clear message not to encourage laziness? Fine by me. That's what we need.
Esdad71: This law has been on the books since 07 and it does not restrict feeding the homeless but what it does not want is you to create a soup kitchen on private property. You cannot have more than 25, including service people, or you can be fined/arrested. This is not about feeding the homeless but protesting. Bottom line. Apply for a permit and you can feed them. twice per year. So, if you have 6 people you can do it once a month. if you had 180 people, by law, you could do it everyday. If you apply there is no legal reason for them to decline it and if they did you would then have an argument and a case. If you want to help the homeless, do it in a legal fashion and do not just protest
Byeluvolk: This story being presented in this light is only an attempt to incite the masses; there is nothing to be gained from fighting this law. If you want to help the homeless then do so, just do so within the bounds of the law.
HERE IS A QUESTION: If, while visiting on vacation, a large group of homeless surrounded your VACATION, would you be more or less likely to return to Orlando for another vacation? It's tough to answer.
Originally posted by lestweforget
reply to post by Vitchilo
Can you or any one explain to me what purpose this law serves?
I must be missing something!
Originally posted by SelfSustainedLoner
No one will listen to me because I don't have a flashy side image or a quote of a famous mouth in my sig. I was homeless for 8 years. Homeless people still, and do use telephone to contact one another, we would usually call or write to state local shelters to contact one another.
THE ONLY REASON PEOPLE ARE BEING ARRESTED FOR FEEDING THE HOMELESS IS BECAUSE WE CALL OUR HOMELESS FRIENDS TO TELL THEM WHERE THE FOOD IS AT.
Florida does not want more homeless people in it's state. Punish the people who feed them, both the homeless and the public will cease to congregate around the homeless. Get it?