It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nibiru/Planet X ? Pictures by Professional Photographer

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:08 AM
link   
The following pictures had been taken by a profession photographer with a $2,000 camera (Sony NEX-VG10), on May 26th, 2011 - Dallas, TX.

Click Link to Source




posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:10 AM
link   


Here is the video for those that want to see.



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:12 AM
link   
Repost of a repost apparently.

Lens flare btw.

Also, owning a $2,000 camera doesn't make you a professional photographer.

If he can't identify lens flare, then he's a mug, not a pro.




edit on 4/6/11 by Chadwickus because: added extra douchebaggery



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:14 AM
link   
I'd be inclinded to agree that it is lens flare



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:17 AM
link   
reply to post by gekados
 


What does the price of the camera have to do with the validity of the statement?

$2000 dollar lense flare btw.



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:18 AM
link   
Professional or not, it's not changing the errors of lens. I think it's a lens flare too.



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:18 AM
link   
This isn't just a lens flare.... It's an obvious lens flare.


Claiming It's Nibiru is rather silly, IMO.



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:25 AM
link   
I know all kinds of bored housewives with $2k cameras who don't even know what "aperture" means.


A much more interesting commentary on this is here: solarobservatory.blogspot.com...

And his own picture of the sun with something near it is really interesting (front page of his blog right now):

1.bp.blogspot.com...



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:40 AM
link   
Since everybody said it, here I go.

Lens Flare!



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:43 AM
link   
Nope can not possibly be a lense flair. It has to be be errm Niburu, planet X...

Just guessing though






posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 08:45 AM
link   

Originally posted by gekados
The following pictures had been taken by a profession photographer with a $2,000 camera (Sony NEX-VG10), on May 26th, 2011 - Dallas, TX.

Click Link to Source


First, I am not a professional photographer.

Second, I am not sure I could turn a $2000 camera on.

Third, in the last image you show, the highest illumination on the "spherical shape" is on the side opposite the sun. I hope I do not smell a rat!

Try taking a picture through the lens of a welding hood or glue a coin to the ends of a stick to block out the sun's direct light.

After you do this I would be interested to look at the pictures you get.

If the images are still the same post the as a reply to mine and we can talk.



posted on Jun, 4 2011 @ 01:35 PM
link   
buying a $2k camera does not impart any competence , knowledge or common sense



posted on Jun, 8 2011 @ 08:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by gekados
The following pictures had been taken by a profession photographer with a $2,000 camera (Sony NEX-VG10), on May 26th, 2011 - Dallas, TX.

Click Link to Source



It has now been four days since my last post here.

I really am interested what other photos of this nature may show.

I hope you will take some and repost with your findings.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join