It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I started out being pro-war, because the reasons they had seemed solid to me. I am still pro-war, but now I am beggining to think that this whole thing is a distraction. A ploy, somthing for the massess to concentrate on.
I'm not saying Bush is planning somthing, I'm saying more people may be in on it than you think. (Wasn't Bin Laden trained by the CIA?)
I wonder if we are all being misled...
And it seems to me, if I'm right, that you guys would be playing right into their hands. They want chaos and discord, because durring chaos and discord people look for a strong, influential leader. They seem to be doing a good job to me.
I thought people here were conspiracy nuts, not sheep! Where's your spirit!?!?!?
Originally posted by mad scientist
Ahhh yes the good ole unbias Iraqi news. Come on you don't really expect them to be telling the truth.
OK, you admit it was used then. Thanks for your cooperation.
Originally posted by Dangerous_Brian
According to your link the Napalm was only used after a ton of bombs were dropped up there. It wasn't used on anyone living, it was used to clear out the area and destroy what was left of the Iraqi equipment.
So CNN is unfair to your government? Sorry, but I don't buy it. About not appearing on Al-Jazeera... you sure? Maybe in the Arab original version. It seems the English written web was attacked.
Lets also keep in mind the use of Napalm was reported by CNN. I don't remember seeing anything about it on Al-Jazeera.
I were talking about the Afghans. I am sure you've benn plenty of time to judge them.
"and you accused them of Terrorisms without a fair and regular trial. "
We can accuse them all we want. They'll get their trial! I wonder how you expect us to have a trial for them all right out in the battlefield! Give it some time. I wonder how much thought you put into your argument.
Originally posted by Dangerous_Brian
"OK, you admit it was used then"
I have no idea if we've actually used them. I thought you were smart enough to get what I was implying with my statement about CNN. They report everything they hear, no matter the truth.
Also, can you tell me the harm in tossing napalm onto some Iraqi equipment after everyone in the area has been killed?
If you could kindly give me a link stating the current status of the people in Afghanistan being held for terrorism that would be great.
Yours are surely *great* Come on, kid, don't get picky. America liberated what? We are all dependant to the USA nowadays, so economically speaking, you conquered us economically. You always say 'Be grateful you don't speak German right now' So what? We all speak English now? I don't see the difference: neither one is my native tongue.
Originally posted by 5POF
**(suppressed senseless rant)**
But then the UN has banned any bayonette larger than a spoon so who the hell gives a rat's A$$!
America has liberated the world ONCE before, and now it is Liberating Iraq.
So why don't you just buz off or at least come up with REAL arguments.
Nice point! Instead, nowadays girls pay to get her hair blonde... Find the differences... No, really, I got your point, but that makes USA 'economycal occupation' only the lesser of tho evils. On EU we are trying to cut somewhat the overdependence on the dollar. Is that wrong? I don't think so.
Originally posted by Toltec
Excuse me but it is very apparent as to the intent of Adolph Hitler had he won MakodFilu. You and I would not be speaking any language. By today or within the next 50 years, this planet would have been populated only by blue eyed blondes from Germany and or Austria.