It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by William
Well, MakodFilu, someone has sold you a "bill of goods" on Iraq.
Indeed, by "appearances" Iraq seems progressive. However, Saddam is a proven horrific dictator... there's not point in arguing this.
Also, if you recall history...
All attempts have failed. What else do you believe should be attempted at this point?
Originally posted by William
Saddm has built the appearance of freedom. In reality, his regime is among the most brutal in the region.
I would have preferred a more surgical assination, but on the grand scheme, it is much less ethical than invading Iraq. Thanks to an exact interpretation of 1441, there is some justification for what our government is doing... it's thin, but it's there.
In the end, we are suffering the fallout from the failure of the UN. It will hurt us, and hurt the UN as well.
Originally posted by dragonrider
the difference is that free media is showing the war on one hand, and on the other, Iraqi owned TV is depicting assasinated soldiers' bodies and live soldiers being interrogated for the sole purpose of humiliation and propaganda. Posted by Thomas Crowne
I have to disagree with one part... Our media, Im not sure I would quite characterize it as "free"... Keep in mind, the cabal/illuminati/globalist/ect OWNS all major networks.... You will NEVER see anything on broadcast TV unless it is something someone WANTS you to see...
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Blanket accuasations of possible atrocities is a poor cover for the known and ghastly atrocities commited bythe hussein regime.
Originally posted by BeLLaTrIx
And as far as the Geneva convention I don't know of one country that has not broken it..
But the US led coalition is there and it is only a matter of time till Saddam is either assasinated, killed, or captured.
I would say suicide but I think he is too big of a coward to do it.
Originally posted by William
Also, if you recall history, Iraq invaded Kuwait, destroyed much of its cities, attempted to destroy its money-making resources (oil wells), and required a brief but intense battle to remove. As we led the coalition to drive Iraq out, and deep into thier desert, we stopped to accept unconditional terms of cease fire which included the elimination of offensive weapons. Subsequent UN resolutions attempted to keep Iraq unable to attack neighbors.
All attempts have failed. What else do you believe should be attempted at this point?