he said they would look at people who are attending radical political speeches given by religious nuts about bringing the government down...is there really anything wrong with giving a bit more a suspicious eye on people who are possible violent radicals?

sorry i missed that end part and phased out in a brain fart for a second...but regardless what is the problem with that? if these people are looking at the violent overturn of government and are attending radical political speeches and they're proven to be guilty of conspiracy to commit violent actions then why would you sympathize with them?

just to add your personal attacks are unnecessary bud

I think he was referring to possible al qaeda members, not Americans, and certainly not people who attend his father's protests . Quite a stretch isn't it?

I just hope this was out of context and will be forgoten, and will not damage the Ron Paul campaign
Go Ron Paul !!!

Not Biblical in any way but,

'And the son will always defy the father'

Damn. I hoped these 2 would come together in a united front.

If not, move aside Rand and let Daddy take the reigns.

Ron has already been where Rand wants to go. Learn from experience ya little pup!

Just a Canadian point of view.