Kevin Annett Arrested and Denied Entry to UK

Originally posted by Mike_A
reply to post by wcitizen

 

I followed the aftermath of Op Ore but I don't remember that, do you have a reputable source to back this up?

I'll see if I can find it again. I won't be able to do it right now, but will surely look it up and get back to you.

do you really want prison as punishment for child molestors?..sorry..but i think i know how the majority would answer..en.wikipedia.org...
still love your church??..
Prior to 2001, all cases were handled privately within dioceses. In 2001 then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger sent a letter to all bishops ordering all sex-abuse cases be transferred to the Vatican. He imposed total secrecy on the proceedings, with the penalty of excommunication for any violations.[68]
It is difficult to ascertain the correct statistics for clerical sexual abuse in Italy because the Italian government has a treaty with the Vatican that guarantees areas of immunity to Vatican officials, including bishops and priests

I need 20 post to start a thread.

I need 20 post to start a thread.

reply to post by wcitizen


Some info on that tribunal, (It is a common law tribunal) here due for Sept 12 2011,

www.fourwinds10.com...

Have to say I'm not sure where this man is coming from, but he should be entitled to speak.

Originally posted by smurfy
reply to post by wcitizen

 

Some info on that tribunal, (It is a common law tribunal) here due for Sept 12 2011,

www.fourwinds10.com...

Have to say I'm not sure where this man is coming from, but he should be entitled to speak.

The common law tribunal becomes a huge threat to TBTB, if it's allowed to go ahead it sets a precedent for the people to address the corruption of the elite. So this is a double whammy for them. More exposure of the genocide perpetrated by the Vatican and other elites, and opening an avenue for restoring common law tribunals, as per magna carta, which allows the people to control the government.

Want an interesting read for an hour or 3?
This blog has been calling it dead on for a good while now:


threedeadwords.com...

reply to post by wcitizen


That would be reasonable to assume, but your video link is inadvisable and unusable, perhaps this one works,

www.youtube.com...

Thanks smurfy, but I'm not sure what you're referring to?

reply to post by wcitizen


Your youtube link is not working, the hotlink on the word unrepentant is not necessary...it's dead now anyway.

reply to post by wcitizen


Starred and flagged. It's not just the British government who has stuff to hide, it's pretty much every single government out there. What do you guys really think would happen if some of the low, sleazy and disgusting acts our government(s) or people within it have done came to light?

They're trying to stop riots. They've seen what happened in Egypt and Libya, they're scared. Because if enough of the truth comes out, it'll spark a global revolution. And if you ask me, it's about time! Far too long have the vile "creatures" in power had their claws in humanity. We need to shake them free so we can live free once again.

/Tired ramblings.

Originally posted by Frontkjemper
reply to post by wcitizen

 

Starred and flagged. It's not just the British government who has stuff to hide, it's pretty much every single government out there. What do you guys really think would happen if some of the low, sleazy and disgusting acts our government(s) or people within it have done came to light?

They're trying to stop riots. They've seen what happened in Egypt and Libya, they're scared. Because if enough of the truth comes out, it'll spark a global revolution. And if you ask me, it's about time! Far too long have the vile "creatures" in power had their claws in humanity. We need to shake them free so we can live free once again.

/Tired ramblings.

Yes, I agree. It's time the walls of secrecy and cover-up be torn down. They may not allow Kevin Annett to hold his tribunal, but he has already shown such a tribunal can be set up.....and that it scares the )(&^^ out of them. This is a significant piece of information which must not be overlooked.

They are also very twitchy now about the freeman movement, and asked youtube to remove the video of the freeman arresting the judge in a Liverpool court. They will no doubt try to suppress the freeman movement too...but they will have a real fight on their hands with them, that's for sure.

The growing awareness of the fraud which is the judicial system could be one of their achilles heels - the more we educate ourselves about how the fraudulent system works, the more we learn how to set up Common Law Courts, the more we can give teeth to our attempts to resist them on their own turf.

It's still a slow process, but inch by inch progess is being made.

We need to kick up a fuss about Kevin Annett's politically based, groundless denial of entry.

Google christopher story/madeleine mccann to find out why he
was assassinated.(madeleine was abducted on demand for the perverse sexual
gratifications of a certain portuguese EU president)
Google dunblain/government paedophia ring to discover the extents of and reasons for the cover-up.
Google gordon brown/paedophile.
Google francois mitterrand/paedophile
Google george bush jn + sn/paedophile
Google Brice Taylor/Thanks for the memories to discover the
involvement of presidents, bob hope, henry kissenger etc. in padophilia and
mind control/sex slave rings.

All these sick deplorable bastards are calling all the shots in our world.
They themselves are controlled and blackmailed into furthering an agenda.
The media is owned and protects these sick despicable puppets.
This is systematic and still these scum of the earth strive.
My blood boils over these inhumans and my heart bleeds for the poor, poor victim children.
When Oh When? Oh Dear Lord When?

reply to post by wcitizen



They really don't want him to spill the beans and expose the whole disgusting worldwide pedophilia rings that operate, not just in the churches. It goes a lot deeper in higher society than we 'common folk' will ever realize. The Hollie Greig expo'se is just one of millions of cases.

I suppose the next thing we'll be told is that Kevin Annett has either 1) Committed 'suicide' by shooting himself at point blank range between the eyes TWICE!!
or (2) he'll get charged with 'raping 2 women', and then later on the charges mysteriously 'dropped'
or (3) we'll be told he's got 'kiddie porn on his PC,
or (4) there will be a 'hit and run accident' and he, Kevin Annett, will be the 'unfortunate victim'.

Gosh this reads like I'm pessimistic or something, maybe I've just read too much.

Awesome thread, thank you for starting it.

Originally posted by kiwitina948
reply to post by wcitizen

 

They really don't want him to spill the beans and expose the whole disgusting worldwide pedophilia rings that operate, not just in the churches. It goes a lot deeper in higher society than we 'common folk' will ever realize. The Hollie Greig expo'se is just one of millions of cases.

Yes, I agree with you there. It's everywhere, imo it runs right through the whole fabric of all the various 'authorities'

I suppose the next thing we'll be told is that Kevin Annett has either 1) Committed 'suicide' by shooting himself at point blank range between the eyes TWICE!!
or (2) he'll get charged with 'raping 2 women', and then later on the charges mysteriously 'dropped'
or (3) we'll be told he's got 'kiddie porn on his PC,
or (4) there will be a 'hit and run accident' and he, Kevin Annett, will be the 'unfortunate victim'.

Gosh this reads like I'm pessimistic or something, maybe I've just read too much.

Awesome thread, thank you for starting it.

For sure, he's at risk. They've tried a few tricks on him already, but this latest one suggests to me they are upping the ante. Thank goodness he's well known now, that offers him some protection at least.

(and thanks

Originally posted by wcitizen
There are NO grounds to exclude him from the country on account of the fact that he intends to undertake public speaking activities. NONE.

No, there are none that YOU are aware of. You weren't involved and neither was I.

And as much as I have suspicions about our govt and so on, our UK immigration would have a huge legal case on their hands had they refused him entry with no explanation and without due cause. It doesn't work like that. We simply do not know the facts - we only know his side of the story.

I suspect there is a reason, but like many cases, it isn't public domain.

Originally posted by noonebutme

Originally posted by wcitizen
There are NO grounds to exclude him from the country on account of the fact that he intends to undertake public speaking activities. NONE.

No, there are none that YOU are aware of. You weren't involved and neither was I.

You are correct, none that I am personally aware of. However, in the statement which was released they made known the official reason which was given to him for being denied entry.

And as much as I have suspicions about our govt and so on, our UK immigration would have a huge legal case on their hands had they refused him entry with no explanation and without due cause. It doesn't work like that.

Really? That's as only as far as YOU know. I imagine you aren't personally aware of all the facts of everyone who has been denied entry?

And the courts never act in the interests of 'politics'? Are you familiar with the Hollie Grieg case? What about the Dr. Kelly case?

We simply do not know the facts - we only know his side of the story.

Yes we do know some of the facts. We know he has made a public statement making public the reason he was given. What we don't have is that same information from a government source.

We also know a lot about him and a lot about the government, and a LOT about the context of his visit, and why they might want to keep him out at any cost.

I suspect there is a reason, but like many cases, it isn't public domain.

Well, actually, it is public domain because he he has put it in the public domain. It would only be untrue if he has lied about it. Personally, I don't believe that's the case.

What you seem to be saying is that you will believe what the government says, but doubt what he says.

Just read the link and was in disabelief at one part especially.

'While detained, Kevin was denied the right to communicate with others, and the arresting officers refused to give him their names or badge numbers'

Why is that? Is it because he is not a British citizen? So he does not have rights?

The child abuse cases at the care home on Haut de la Garenne in Jersey always got my interest. Again many theories around what took place at the home and again theories of elite establishment figures being involved.





www.guardian.co.uk...

Have you found a source for that Op Ore claim?