It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Pentagon has concluded that computer sabotage coming from another country can constitute an act of war, a finding that for the first time opens the door for the U.S. to respond using traditional military force.
Originally posted by pandapowerjamie
reply to post by Advantage
Great. I agree with you, China it is, then by the world?
Jamie.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
reply to post by Advantage
The attack on Lockheed was a joke, it didn't accomplish anything.
But that doesn't mean it wont be used as an example to try and tighten up the reins of internet use.edit on 31-5-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)
The report will also spark a debate over a range of sensitive issues the Pentagon left unaddressed, including whether the U.S. can ever be certain about an attack's origin, and how to define when computer sabotage is serious enough to constitute an act of war. These questions have already been a topic of dispute within the military. One idea gaining momentum at the Pentagon is the notion of "equivalence." If a cyber attack produces the death, damage, destruction or high-level disruption that a traditional military attack would cause, then it would be a candidate for a "use of force" consideration, which could merit retaliation.
Originally posted by GringoViejo
reply to post by Advantage
That's where we find ourselves in an area that's less black and white. We would first have to assume that these vulnerabilities were unknown. The systems that were "hacked" weren't important enough to have any real protection.
As a former Lockheed employee, I can tell you this is not the first time Lockheed has been "hacked." That's why i said in another thread that anything of any real importance has been safe from the threat of computers for a long time. However, this is the first time that the media has covered the subject with such vigor. That's what is *odd* to me about the situation, and made "odder" by the pentagons recent finding that you posted.
That's just my opinion.edit on 31-5-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)edit on 31-5-2011 by GringoViejo because: (no reason given)
The only thing Im waiting for is to hear a peep about HAP being infiltrated.. and thats when this new idea form the pent will be rolled out on a red carpet Id think.
Originally posted by Advantage
www.foxnews.com...
and
online.wsj.com...
The Pentagon has concluded that computer sabotage coming from another country can constitute an act of war, a finding that for the first time opens the door for the U.S. to respond using traditional military force.
Looks like we're going to war with China real soon.edit on 31-5-2011 by Advantage because: added another link
“So if in fact there is a nation who is compliant with all the rules ahead of time…if they fire against the United States, a biological weapon, a chemical weapon, or maybe a cyber attack, then we aren’t going to be firing back with nuclear weapons…doesn’t that make us all feel safe?”