It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
Originally posted by bsbray11
The word "chemtrail" does not translate literally into German.
But the word "chaff" does.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
You really are useless aren't you.
I haven't made assumptions - I made an inference - and thank you again for ensuring I have teh correct terminology
Already back-tracking again.
You are literally so intellectually dishonest that you can't even stick to your story for two posts in a row. You admit making assumptions and then as soon as it comes down to you not being able to prove to others that they aren't necessarily looking at contrails (because you can't really tell, you can only make various assumptions), then you immediately recant and start up a semantic word game.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
I admitted to making assumptions and then admitted that I had used the wrong word - sorry for not being perfect.
If you were as intellectually honest as I am supposedly dishonest you would have corrected me at the time
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Phage
Originally posted by bsbray11
The word "chemtrail" does not translate literally into German.
But the word "chaff" does.
Yet chaff does not modify the weather like the program is actually suggesting, does it?
They are talking about something different. You are just unable to admit the military could be doing things that you don't know about. Apparently you have to know everything, and nothing else can exist that you don't already know about.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Yet chaff does not modify the weather like the program is actually suggesting, does it?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
I admitted to making assumptions and then admitted that I had used the wrong word - sorry for not being perfect.
Assumption was the right word.
You only changed it once you realized the full extent of what you were saying, and then of course it had to be any word but "assumption," even though you are obviously making assumptions that the military would not do such a thing.
If you were as intellectually honest as I am supposedly dishonest you would have corrected me at the time
I did,
the problem is just that you don't actually pay attention to what I post because you're too busy being right.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Phage
Originally posted by bsbray11
The word "chemtrail" does not translate literally into German.
But the word "chaff" does.
Yet chaff does not modify the weather like the program is actually suggesting, does it?
They are talking about something different. You are just unable to admit the military could be doing things that you don't know about. Apparently you have to know everything, and nothing else can exist that you don't already know about.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Save your cult rant and explain to me what they are "really" talking about through all of those images of meteorologists, computer screens of cloud formations, and imagery of military planes.
Die Aufzeichnungen belegen, dass dabei sehr geringe Mengen von Düppeln ausgebracht werden
the reports show that very small quantities of chaff were used
Originally posted by bsbray11
Here's something else for you guys to scramble to try and "debunk," even though you are still struggling with the German news program (I know, I know, I take no sympathy on you):
I guess this guy is just a liar too. Not much else you can argue at this point, really.
What is this, whack-a-bunk?
What exactly do you find so convincing about that video? How about the Shasta snow sample at 6:35? Is that a good example? If that were shown to be bogus, then would that give you any pause? Or is there a better one in there?
Originally posted by adeclerk
Why are you still posting the WITWATS bull that has been debunked, again and again and again. I guess you don't read?
Originally posted by firepilot
And why do they not only ignore the debunking, but they actualy will defend, tooth and nail, the people who did the lying? is there a single case on ATS of chemmies who will admit to getting mad about being lied to?
Originally posted by bsbray11
I'm not defending anyone who is lying.edit on 9-6-2011 by bsbray11 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by adeclerk
Why are you still posting the WITWATS bull that has been debunked, again and again and again. I guess you don't read?
You've never debunked it to me.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
you could use your clearly improving 'net search ability to figure it out for yourself......try www.contrailscience.com - there's a link of the left of the page specifically to WITWATS
Or try the sistersite www.metabunk.com - there's no specific thread there, but there are a lot of articles in hte chemtrail forum, and perhaps the debunking forum, dealing at great depth with some of the claims made in the movie by various people.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
you could use your clearly improving 'net search ability to figure it out for yourself......try www.contrailscience.com - there's a link of the left of the page specifically to WITWATS
Or try the sistersite www.metabunk.com - there's no specific thread there, but there are a lot of articles in hte chemtrail forum, and perhaps the debunking forum, dealing at great depth with some of the claims made in the movie by various people.
Come on, you're getting lazy man. You don't want to call the guy a liar himself so you direct me to other websites to do your dirty work?
A former FBI chief talking about what's going on:
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
He's not a former FBI chief