It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by SirCoxone
post a picture of either a coyote or a domestic dog and ask me to tell you if it is a coyote or a dog and I will tell you which it is and offer solid evidence to support my claim.
See how it works?
So how would you tell a chemtrail apart from a normal contrail?
Give me specifics as to how you would be able to tell one white trail left by a plane, apart from another white trail left by a plane that has other chemicals in it.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Are there any I missed??
Yeah, you missed everything that the US military or other groups are dumping covertly.
The stuff that you don't believe happens, because otherwise you would surely know about it by now?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Are you going to prove to me that they do exist, and thus show how my conclusion is in error?
Originally posted by Uncinus
And isn't the chemtrail theory that the trails DO look different?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Are you going to prove to me that they do exist, and thus show how my conclusion is in error?
I don't have to show how it's in error.
You are obviously just making assumptions.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by bsbray11
I don't have to show how it's in error.
then I must be right
You are obviously just making assumptions.
Aren't you?
So what is yuor basis for those assumptions?
You know the basis for mine
Originally posted by bsbray11
You are obviously just making assumptions.
Aren't you?
Yes, I am. The difference between you and me is that I'm man enough to admit it. But you aren't.
Actually I'm close to taking that back because you just said this:
So what is yuor basis for those assumptions?
You know the basis for mine
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Right - so mine are justified by logic and evidence - what are yours justified by?
Originally posted by bsbray11
So how would you tell a chemtrail apart from a normal contrail?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Apparently you are wrong - assumption are part of logic - en.wikipedia.org...
In logic an assumption is a proposition that is taken for granted, as if it were true based upon presupposition without preponderance of the facts.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Apparently you are wrong - assumption are part of logic - en.wikipedia.org...
You linked to deduction, not to assumption.
The kind of assuming you are doing has nothing to do with deduction.
You haven't deduced that the military isn't covertly dumping chemicals for whatever reason.
You just dismiss it out of hand because you have faith that otherwise is the case.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Yeah, to most people that post without multiple accounts.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Ahh...so you can find things that are not actually on the page when you decide to look for them - you are improving...albeit slowly and insufficiently
The kind of assuming you are doing has nothing to do with deduction.
Quite right - because as you have helped me realise, I am not assuming at all - I am infering - "he act of drawing a conclusion by deductive reasoning from given facts"
You haven't deduced that the military isn't covertly dumping chemicals for whatever reason.
You just can't leave that argument from ignorance alone, can you!!
But you see I'm not actually saying anything about military spraying at all ...
You just dismiss it out of hand because you have faith that otherwise is the case.
Nope - I'm saying there is no evidence for it
Originally posted by Goathief
And there it is!
Now that your "argument from ignorance" stance has fallen flat on it's face I guess the above ad hominem is the only thing you're left with.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Uncinus
And isn't the chemtrail theory that the trails DO look different?
Yeah, to most people that post without multiple accounts. That's when you start making up excuses about atmospheric conditions being different and planes descending and ascending causing the "contrails" to look different.
Originally posted by adeclerk
So meteorologists noticed persistent contrails and thought it was out of the ordinary? Not buying it, any meteorologist will explain what every debunker has already tried to explain to you.
Originally posted by bsbray11
The kind of assuming you are doing has nothing to do with deduction.
Quite right - because as you have helped me realise, I am not assuming at all - I am infering - "he act of drawing a conclusion by deductive reasoning from given facts"
You can shop for different words all day,
you are still assuming the military isn't dumping anything covertly.
You haven't deduced that the military isn't covertly dumping chemicals for whatever reason.
You just can't leave that argument from ignorance alone, can you!!
The fact that you haven't deduced that the military isn't dumping anything covertly, is not an argument from ignorance. It's a fact. Based on .... the fact that you haven't actually deduced it.
But you see I'm not actually saying anything about military spraying at all ...
I know, you are intentionally insinuating it's not a possibility. Which is laughably naive.
You just dismiss it out of hand because you have faith that otherwise is the case.
No, that's not all you're saying,
because you're trying to refute the idea outright. You can't refute something by posting evidence for something else instead.
Both things can exist at the same time.
You just keep ignoring that.
Originally posted by Goathief
And there it is!
Now that your "argument from ignorance" stance has fallen flat on it's face I guess the above ad hominem is the only thing you're left with.
"Ad hominem" is an insult.
You don't think it's possible to post with multiple accounts here?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
I am saying that there is nothing known that looks and behaves like contrails that is not a contrail.
The fact that you haven't deduced that the military isn't dumping anything covertly, is not an argument from ignorance. It's a fact. Based on .... the fact that you haven't actually deduced it.
so what would I deduce it from?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by adeclerk
So meteorologists noticed persistent contrails and thought it was out of the ordinary? Not buying it, any meteorologist will explain what every debunker has already tried to explain to you.
Not the meteorologists featured in that video, huh.
And that's not actually what they said but I'm not even going to resist your constant misrepresenting of the data laid before you. It's a habit only you have the power to break.
Your fraudulent argument from authority is noted though.