It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrWendal
According to them, they are the only ones going to Heaven. Funny thing about this group that no one ever wants to talk about is how their hate filled message actually does come from the Bible.
Originally posted by jude11
Freedoms and Rights belong to EVERYONE.
If it is denied to the less popular, it's neither a freedom nor a right but simply permission. "May I have my freedoms....Please?"
While I DO NOT agree with the agenda of these people, where is the line drawn for their rights that they are exercising?
If they have their freedoms of Speech, Non-Violent Protesting and the right to gather in a public place taken away, where does it end? With you? Me?
Again, I DO NOT agree with them but they are not breaking any laws. If new laws are created to stop them because people just don't agree with them and don't like their message, it will be another case of destroying the rights of the entire Country.
Difficult situation I agree, but if a law is passed for them it's enforced on everyone and if people cheer for the police denying them their rights, what happens when it comes back and those cheering people have their rights denied down the road?
It won't be entertaining anymore.
Personally, I would rather have citizens take care of this bunch....and hope they do it in a back alley. That's Justice!
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
First off, there are no longer any "fighting words" clauses, anywhere. I can get in your face and heap abuse on you, your mother
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
You have no legal right to lay a finger on me because of that (of course, if you feel threatened by me, or if I make a verbal threat, you DO get to defend yourself - "YOU'RE A BOOGER HEAD!" is protected, "I'M GOING TO KICK YOUR ASS!" is not)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
You have the right to express whatever you want so long as it does not demonstrably cause harm to another (whether through defamation or intimidation)
Originally posted by jude11
Freedoms and Rights belong to EVERYONE.
If it is denied to the less popular, it's neither a freedom nor a right but simply permission. "May I have my freedoms....Please?"
While I DO NOT agree with the agenda of these people, where is the line drawn for their rights that they are exercising?
If they have their freedoms of Speech, Non-Violent Protesting and the right to gather in a public place taken away, where does it end? With you? Me?
Again, I DO NOT agree with them but they are not breaking any laws. If new laws are created to stop them because people just don't agree with them and don't like their message, it will be another case of destroying the rights of the entire Country.
Difficult situation I agree, but if a law is passed for them it's enforced on everyone and if people cheer for the police denying them their rights, what happens when it comes back and those cheering people have their rights denied down the road?
It won't be entertaining anymore.
Personally, I would rather have citizens take care of this bunch....and hope they do it in a back alley. That's Justice!
edit on 29-5-2011 by jude11 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Nah, I disagree with this automatic ''right'' to free speech with no legal consequences or accountability.
There are quite a few legal exemptions to the First Amendment of the US Constitution, such as slander, defamation, obscenity and, not least, the ''fighting words'' restriction to free speech, which I'm pretty sure that they can be reasonably suspected of falling foul of.
First off, there are no longer any "fighting words" clauses, anywhere. I can get in your face and heap abuse on you, your mother, and everything you hold dear all day long, and you have no legal right to lay a finger on me because of that (of course, if you feel threatened by me, or if I make a verbal threat, you DO get to defend yourself - "YOU'RE A BOOGER HEAD!" is protected, "I'M GOING TO KICK YOUR ASS!" is not)
You have the right to express whatever you want so long as it does not demonstrably cause harm to another (whether through defamation or intimidation)
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Originally posted by TheWalkingFox
First off, there are no longer any "fighting words" clauses, anywhere. I can get in your face and heap abuse on you, your mother
The First Amendment of the US Constitution has a number of exemptions to it that have been granted by the US Supreme Court. Depictions of child pornography, for example, have been defined as illegal, yet the yapping ''mah rights'' brigade never question this violation of the First Amendment.
Originally posted by silent thunder
Originally posted by MrWendal
According to them, they are the only ones going to Heaven. Funny thing about this group that no one ever wants to talk about is how their hate filled message actually does come from the Bible.
This is 100% true and I have noticed the same fact and how it makes people uncomfortable.
These people are basically just super-strict, literalist Calvinists, at least theologically. I am of the mind that this group is really a money-making racket based on lawsuits, although it might have started out more sincerely and there is indications that they take theology seriously (although they warp it by going all-in on issues they like and ignoring everything else).
Where do you think the Pilgrim Fathers would feel more at home: Sitting around the Phelps living room discussing the nuances of Lapsarianism, or at a Gay Pride parade? Not saying its right, far from it -- but as noted, people are quick to ignore this.
Nah... they don't deserve their freedoms. They use it as a weapon to hurt others and those kind of people don't deserve to have it.
Originally posted by jude11
Freedoms and Rights belong to EVERYONE.
If it is denied to the less popular, it's neither a freedom nor a right but simply permission. "May I have my freedoms....Please?"
If they have their freedoms of Speech, Non-Violent Protesting and the right to gather in a public place taken away, where does it end? With you? Me?
edit on 29-5-2011 by jude11 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
There is freedom of speech.
At the same time, though, there's a right to kick the living snot out of, well T&C forbids my vulgarity, but I think you get the point.
Originally posted by Alienmojo
Nah... they don't deserve their freedoms. They use it as a weapon to hurt others and those kind of people don't deserve to have it.edit on 30-5-2011 by Alienmojo because: Chopped some off quote...
Originally posted by krossfyter
reply to post by britt
dont mean to derail thread.. just curious....
why do christians reject/or whatever u want to call it parts of the old testament and accept others? would this be a situation in which one is being selective to promote their viewpoint (fit your agenda) as these WBC folks are doing? sure they promote the hate field/legalist side of the old testament. Other christians choose to reject this side for other parts of the old testament. I understand when one says that Jesus came and showed us the new covenant we are to live under that the old testament is the old covenant etc. But if you are going to consider the bible as a whole why would u reject anything in the old testament? IE.... slavery. Seems that christians say that those old laws are antiquated and they pick and choose which ones are antiquated? for example christians still keep the laws against homosexuality from the old testament among other things. Pick and choose aesthetic.
edit on 30-5-2011 by krossfyter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by hawkiye
Freedom of speech does not give these idiots the right to disturb your peace.