It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Sunofone
undeniable proof of foreknowledge-
www.cuttingedge.org...
this link is to a strategy card game put out in 95'
please note the cards depicting the wtc,pentagon,as well as distinct conclusion to the wtc attack depicted by a smoke skull in the place where the wtc use to stand-i dont know how it could get any more obvious that this was a staged event in order to usher in a nwo-the title of the cardgame was "illuminatti new world order"
Originally posted by Nygdan
You apparently have a very low threshold for 'undeniable' and 'proof'.
Originally posted by Sunofone
is it a low threshold on my behalf
Originally posted by Nygdan
You apparently have a very low threshold for 'undeniable' and 'proof'.
Originally posted by Nygdan
Nope, its a low threshold on your behalf.
You have a game, that has the wtc and the pentagon as a target. How is that 'undeniable'? how is it even proof? The WTC was attacked before 9/11 and before this game from 1995 was put out. So its inclusion as a target in some card game is pretty well meaningless. Certainly not undeniable proof of anything.
Originally posted by The Vagabond
You have a game, that has the wtc and the pentagon as a target. How is that 'undeniable'? how is it even proof?
OK genius, let's look at the entire card now. It has the WTC being -NUKED- on that card, which it was not. It only shows -ONE- tower on fire.
Then the pentagon card depicts a mushroom cloud squarely in the middle of the pentagon. Nowhere even close to what actually happened.
-EVERYONE- knew that terrorists wanted to bomb the WTC. -EVERYONE- knew that they'd bring it down if they could. The obvious way was to a nuke, which we knew they'd get and use if they could. This is an educated guess on the part of the card's maker, and it was wrong in every way but one (that the WTC was attacked).
Originally posted by Sunofone
i could have totally agreed with everything your presenting had it not been for all the obvious lies that we are being asked to accept-if i had not seen the video of the planes or the collapse and if air traffic control would have at least tried to explain their blatant disregaurd for standard operating procedures-if it wasnt for the molten pool of liquified steel and stone that took days to cool-the view of ground zero from the satelites perspective was amazing the smoke nearly encircled the globe and the core temperatures were not consistent with what you would expect from a couple of towers collapsing due to the failure of its steel reinforced concrete beams-supposedly caused by the heat from burning jet fuel?you know the way the lie is continually repeated and presented as fact every day in one way or another through the control and abuse of an ignorant media does not make it true
Originally posted by Sunofone
Originally posted by The Vagabond
You have a game, that has the wtc and the pentagon as a target. How is that 'undeniable'? how is it even proof?
OK genius, let's look at the entire card now. It has the WTC being -NUKED- on that card, which it was not. It only shows -ONE- tower on fire.
Then the pentagon card depicts a mushroom cloud squarely in the middle of the pentagon. Nowhere even close to what actually happened.
-EVERYONE- knew that terrorists wanted to bomb the WTC. -EVERYONE- knew that they'd bring it down if they could. The obvious way was to a nuke, which we knew they'd get and use if they could. This is an educated guess on the part of the card's maker, and it was wrong in every way but one (that the WTC was attacked).
i could have totally agreed with everything your presenting had it not been for all the obvious lies that we are being asked to accept-if i had not seen the video of the planes or the collapse and if air traffic control would have at least tried to explain their blatant disregaurd for standard operating procedures-if it wasnt for the molten pool of liquified steel and stone that took days to cool-the view of ground zero from the satelites perspective was amazing the smoke nearly encircled the globe and the core temperatures were not consistent with what you would expect from a couple of towers collapsing due to the failure of its steel reinforced concrete beams-supposedly caused by the heat from burning jet fuel?you know the way the lie is continually repeated and presented as fact every day in one way or another through the control and abuse of an ignorant media does not make it true
Originally posted by dcgolf
What lies are you speaking of? The steel did not melt. It's integrity was compromised by the heat. The weight of the many floors on top of the impact point was enough to facilitate the falling of the towers.