It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by wcitizen
It seems to me that most of the posters on this thread have not even watched the video, let alone read the book.
How can anyone claim there is 'no verifiable evidence' - when this guy has put all his evidence in the book and it can all be verified by anyone who wants to take the trouble to do so.
To say you don't find his evidence convincing is one thing, to say it's not verifiable is totally another, and blatantly untrue.
.
I have my book right here. Please direct me to the fist page that has verifiable evidence on it.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by wcitizen
True....so perhaps he should stay amongst crowds and/or family members and not visit any sushi bars
Originally by userid1
When supplied proof to the contrary, birthers either pretend it wasn't said, or include the source to the ever-growing list of "conspirators". (snort - the state of Hawaii - really?)
Originally posted by wcitizen
The corruption in the judiciary system is a very serious obstacle to overcome, and yes, I agree, the Red House (stained with blood) will do everything and anything to kill this.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Let me give you a clue.....no, let me spell it out.
Read the book, and find out what the author puts foward as his evidence.
See if it would be possible to verify that the evidence he presents is authentic. Then make your own assessment as to whether you find the evidence convincing or not.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by Antiquated1
Have you got the book too?
Originally posted by Antiquated1
Originally posted by wcitizen
It seems to me that most of the posters on this thread have not even watched the video, let alone read the book.
How can anyone claim there is 'no verifiable evidence' - when this guy has put all his evidence in the book and it can all be verified by anyone who wants to take the trouble to do so.
To say you don't find his evidence convincing is one thing, to say it's not verifiable is totally another, and blatantly untrue.
I have my book right here. Please direct me to the fist page that has verifiable evidence on it.
Why does he have a Connecticut SS#? Being from Connecticut myself i wonder why he has one.
Why is the # on the BC greater then people born after him?
If Obama’s SSN has a Connecticut geographical code it doesn’t prove anything.
Originally posted by GunzCoty
Why does he have a Connecticut SS#? Being from Connecticut myself i wonder why he has one.
The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.
Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.
Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.
Here’s a plausible and reasonable explanation for the certificate numbers.
Why is the # on the BC greater then people born after him?
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by wcitizen
Ya, I agree with you. People write books to make money.
Corsi writes books for the tea party/republican bandwagon and Birther propaganda sells.
Like I said, give me the goods...not a never-ending pile of empty accusations, and I will believe.
Originally posted by userid1
Originally by userid1
When supplied proof to the contrary, birthers either pretend it wasn't said, or include the source to the ever-growing list of "conspirators". (snort - the state of Hawaii - really?)
Originally posted by wcitizen
The corruption in the judiciary system is a very serious obstacle to overcome, and yes, I agree, the Red House (stained with blood) will do everything and anything to kill this.
And the list of conspirators grows...
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by wcitizen
but he drives a car.......opens his fridge door, etc etc
I can picture it all now.......Obama: "where's Rahm (or Benjamin) Emanuel when you need him the most......" !
Remember the congress woman from Chicago who was about to leave home early in the morning and when she turned on her ignition, the car blew up in her garage and she died?
edit on 24-5-2011 by bluemirage5 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by wcitizen
So the book doesn't prove his accusations? We have to find the truth ourselves?
Lol, I rest my case.