It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Senior members of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee last week instructed the Pentagon to come up with alternatives to the jet fighter of the future, the F-35, with the project facing massive cost overruns.
In the 2010 Strategic Defence and Security Review, it was announced that the carriers would be converted to CATOBAR configuration in order to operate the F-35C variant of the F-35 Lightning II, instead of the F-35B STOVL variant.
Originally posted by Peruvianmonk
Senior members of the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee last week instructed the Pentagon to come up with alternatives to the jet fighter of the future, the F-35, with the project facing massive cost overruns.
www.haaretz.com...
The future seems very cloudy for the F-35.
Is it because it is rubbish or becasue it is ridiculously expensive per plane?
Any tech heads out there who can shed some light on this?
In my opinion this appears to be a huge waste of money. The RAF is slated to purcahse some F-35'S. I would take the Typhoon over this plane any day of the week.edit on 24-5-2011 by Peruvianmonk because: Spelling
Originally posted by Buddha1098
The F-35 is more expensive and less capable then the Chinese J-20. It only makes sense for them to scrap the project.
Originally posted by Cosmic4life
YF-23, greatest aircraft never made, a great shame.