It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
More proof that the faa announced flights did not partake to the sky that fateful day because 2 of the tailnumbers assigned to those flight numbers STILL EXISTED years after those planes were supposedly destroyed. In other words how can THE SAME REGISTRED AIRCRAFT still be flying if they crashed into buildings???????
Originally posted by jman449
Modified Boeings... Def not holograms.
It would be way easier to just modify the plane.edit on 5/20/11 by jman449 because:
Originally posted by roboe
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
More proof that the faa announced flights did not partake to the sky that fateful day because 2 of the tailnumbers assigned to those flight numbers STILL EXISTED years after those planes were supposedly destroyed. In other words how can THE SAME REGISTRED AIRCRAFT still be flying if they crashed into buildings???????
It doesn't say anything about the aircraft still flying, it merely say it is registred to a particular owner.
Other examples of crashed aircraft that are still registred include N497FE (FedEx flight 1478) and N626TX (Continental Airlines flight 1713).
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by jman449
Modified Boeings... Def not holograms.
It would be way easier to just modify the plane.edit on 5/20/11 by jman449 because:
Yes I agree with your assumption. In fact a close-up photo taken on 9-11 in manhattan shows a bulge on at least one aircraft and when Boeing Inc. was asked what that bulge was, they refused to answer under national security directives.
On the other hand, area 51 is known to have worked on particle beam technology(including weaponry) and reverse engineering ufos and highely advanced aircraft designs so it is not entirely unfeasible they would have sophisticated holograms by now.
John Lear, while a member on ATS, was adamant that the planes that hit the twin towers were actually holographic images and when someone with his incredible accomplisments and experience says something like that, then I tend to take it seriously.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by roboe
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
More proof that the faa announced flights did not partake to the sky that fateful day because 2 of the tailnumbers assigned to those flight numbers STILL EXISTED years after those planes were supposedly destroyed. In other words how can THE SAME REGISTRED AIRCRAFT still be flying if they crashed into buildings???????
It doesn't say anything about the aircraft still flying, it merely say it is registred to a particular owner.
Other examples of crashed aircraft that are still registred include N497FE (FedEx flight 1478) and N626TX (Continental Airlines flight 1713).
So your saying when a plane crashes and becomes a write-off, the registration number gets transferred to a new owner rather than get retired? How do you know this to be fact? Thanks for the reply.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by yourmaker
There were no "explosives" *planted* inside the buildings.
This is foolish nonsense, has been beaten to death, years ago.
....when there is so much conflicting information that PROVES 9-11 was an inside job?
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Alfie1
I remember hearing on the news that a reporter called from her mobile phone aboard the airplane to some relative on the ground, I think her husband, and said that people aboard the plane were fighting the terrorists to regain control of the airplane, shortly before it allegedly crashed near shanksville pennsylvania.
Does one or two phone calls, that could easily be hoaxes by the media, prove that alqueda hijacked the planes and crashed them into the twin towers and pentagon, when there is so much conflicting information that PROVES 9-11 was an inside job? I think not my friend!
As far as relatives mourning loved ones that DIED ABOARD THE PLANES, I do not recall such information.edit on 5/20/2011 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by roboe
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by roboe
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
More proof that the faa announced flights did not partake to the sky that fateful day because 2 of the tailnumbers assigned to those flight numbers STILL EXISTED years after those planes were supposedly destroyed. In other words how can THE SAME REGISTRED AIRCRAFT still be flying if they crashed into buildings???????
It doesn't say anything about the aircraft still flying, it merely say it is registred to a particular owner.
Other examples of crashed aircraft that are still registred include N497FE (FedEx flight 1478) and N626TX (Continental Airlines flight 1713).
So your saying when a plane crashes and becomes a write-off, the registration number gets transferred to a new owner rather than get retired? How do you know this to be fact? Thanks for the reply.
Nope, I'm saying that the registration is not necessarily changed or removed when an airplane crashes.
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Alfie1
I remember hearing on the news that a reporter called from her mobile phone aboard the airplane to some relative on the ground, I think her husband, and said that people aboard the plane were fighting the terrorists to regain control of the airplane, shortly before it allegedly crashed near shanksville pennsylvania.
Does one or two phone calls, that could easily be hoaxes by the media, prove that alqueda hijacked the planes and crashed them into the twin towers and pentagon, when there is so much conflicting information that PROVES 9-11 was an inside job? I think not my friend!
As far as relatives mourning loved ones that DIED ABOARD THE PLANES, I do not recall such information.edit on 5/20/2011 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by roboe
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Originally posted by roboe
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
More proof that the faa announced flights did not partake to the sky that fateful day because 2 of the tailnumbers assigned to those flight numbers STILL EXISTED years after those planes were supposedly destroyed. In other words how can THE SAME REGISTRED AIRCRAFT still be flying if they crashed into buildings???????
It doesn't say anything about the aircraft still flying, it merely say it is registred to a particular owner.
Other examples of crashed aircraft that are still registred include N497FE (FedEx flight 1478) and N626TX (Continental Airlines flight 1713).
So your saying when a plane crashes and becomes a write-off, the registration number gets transferred to a new owner rather than get retired? How do you know this to be fact? Thanks for the reply.
Nope, I'm saying that the registration is not necessarily changed or removed when an airplane crashes.
So if the registrations are not changed and removed, that means the registration numbers should have been retired. The fact they were not retired means the scheduled flights did not take off that day because if they did the airplanes, and their registration numbers, would have ceased to exist after the 9-11 "crashes".
Case made!edit on 5/20/2011 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)