I want to be the next president of the USA, here's my program

reply to post by Maslo


2. It's your responsibility, duty and contribution for your fellow citizens aka state.

3. Indeed, let the free market decide, but without speculation which thrives the prices up and is unnecessary.

The Death sentence is only for those that undermine the national security in a broad perspective.

reply to post by Regenstorm



wheres your birth certificate?!

Would you answer my question before we elect you? Haunebu / Brown / Grossdeutsches Reich?

I agree and disagree with some of your points, but I'm confused about a few, too...

Originally posted by Regenstorm
2. The first obligation of every citizen must be to work both spiritually and physically.

What does it mean to work "spiritually"
What about people who cannot work physically? Will there be a waiver?

3. Abolition of unearned (work and labor) incomes.

What if someone cannot earn an income? How will they survive?

4. In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal/commercial enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore I demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

I love the first part, but what WILL happen with these profits of war that you confiscate?

10. I demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, smugglers and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

No "fair trial"?

13. The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child,

What does that mean? Is this another way to say "outlaw abortion"? I'm confused.

... the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation,

Children MUST participate in sports? In school? Like in Gym class? Or is this apart from school obligation?

15. I demand freedom of religion for all religious denominations within the state so long as they do not endanger its existence or oppose the moral senses of the people.

Is atheism protected as well? Or does it "oppose the moral senses of the people"? And who decides what opposes the moral senses of the people?

Would you vote for me?

I'll answer that after you clarify the above for me. Thank you.
.

Originally posted by Regenstorm
reply to post by Maslo

 

2. It's your responsibility, duty and contribution for your fellow citizens aka state.

3. Indeed, let the free market decide, but without speculation which thrives the prices up and is unnecessary.

The Death sentence is only for those that undermine the national security in a broad perspective.

So that means that you will be executed first when your silly law is permitted, do you realise that?

Originally posted by cushycrux
"Das Großdeutsche Reich" - Just asking: are you a nazi mr. president?

Nope, I'm an honest and open social nationalist.

Originally posted by Regenstorm

Originally posted by cushycrux
"Das Großdeutsche Reich" - Just asking: are you a nazi mr. president?

Nope, I'm an honest and open social nationalist.

Thats the same, but it is only a different name !

National Socialism, German Nationalsozialismus, also called Nazism or Naziism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany.

Originally posted by notimportant

National Socialism, German Nationalsozialismus, also called Nazism or Naziism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany.

We have a winna!

You can almost hear his balls crawl up inside his body! Lol!

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


2, work with your mind, ideas to improve our society. That's work as well.

3, if you are really disabled you'll get a small payment and cheap housing. On many occasions you are however able to contribute anyhow. Just look at Steve Hawkins.

4, It all goes to the state and will be invested in the state aka people.

10, There will be a fair trail anyway, no one should be convicted until their guilt has been proven.

13, Yes, no abortion and improved education on how to raise a child properly. Teaching them basics like honesty, respect and honor.

Sports, yes, no more lazy fatso's, balanced biological homegrown nutrition as well.

Religion, as stated, it depends on what you try to justify by your religion.
Atheism is for many people a justification for doing whatever they like without respecting others, so yes, that form of Atheism would be forbidden.

I hope the answers are satisfying.

reply to post by Regenstorm


Sounds to me like:

To rescue Germany from the effects of the Great Depression, Nazism promoted an economic Third Position; a managed economy that was neither capitalist nor communist. The Nazis accused communism and capitalism of being associated with Jewish influences and interests.They declared support for a nationalist form of socialism that was to provide for the Aryan race and the German nation economic security, social welfare programs for workers, a just wage, honour for workers' importance to the nation, and protection from capitalist exploitation.

Replace "Germany" with "the USA" and you have something which looks like your political views, mr Regenstorm

reply to post by notimportant



It seems that you are not being fooled.
This thread is just to see how people of today would respond to this program.
It isn't mine, I adapted a little and didn't use the entire program otherwise it would have been recognized immediately.
There are originally 25 points.
You can find them here.

Originally posted by Regenstorm
Just look at Steve Hawkins.

It's Stephen Hawking. And he's a brilliant scientist. You think everyone in a wheelchair has the capacity of Stephen Hawking???

Atheism is for many people a justification for doing whatever they like without respecting others, so yes, that form of Atheism would be forbidden.

So, the state would judge whether or not an atheist was a "real atheist" (deemed harmless) or just someone justifying living their lives without respecting others (deemed dangerous)? Sounds like respecting others would be legally mandated?

No, I would not vote for you. You represent taking away the freedoms and personal rights that we now enjoy. Too many of our rights have been usurped by a large and ungainly government. The LAST thing we need is a dictator-like government telling us how to raise our children, how to treat our women, and what to believe in.

Your demands are the current government's wet dream, however, and I think you could probably get in and find a niche using the Tea Party name if you're interested. But no. I will not be voting to give up rights.

Originally posted by Regenstorm
reply to post by notimportant

 

It seems that you are not being fooled.
This thread is just to see how people of today would respond to this program.
It isn't mine, I adapted a little and didn't use the entire program otherwise it would have been recognized immediately.
There are originally 25 points.
You can find them here.

But your Avatar and Text is still very, well... dubios. I think you try to dodge danger.
Und ausserdem glaub ich nicht das du Amerikaner bist.

Originally posted by cushycrux

Originally posted by Regenstorm
reply to post by notimportant

 

It seems that you are not being fooled.
This thread is just to see how people of today would respond to this program.
It isn't mine, I adapted a little and didn't use the entire program otherwise it would have been recognized immediately.
There are originally 25 points.
You can find them here.

But your Avatar and Text is still very, well... dubios. I think you try to dodge danger.
Und ausserdem glaub ich nicht das du Amerikaner bist.

Tatsächlich bin ich kein Amerikaner, Deutsch bin ich auch nicht.
(I'm not American, German either)
I'm am a social nationalist, I don't hide that. But I'm also someone who doesn't hate and I'm against unnecessary violence. People should respect other nations/races/tribes but also respect themselves.

reply to post by Regenstorm


sorry bro
but I guess that makes us political rivals
as my hat is in the ring as well

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Sounds like an end to government and the rise of total domination by the ruling power, so you must be a democrat and a liberal.

reply to post by Regenstorm


I would probably make a rather good president, but I surely don't want the job. No thanks.

However... If You do become president, will You consider My ideas? I believe they would achieve most of Your goals, if not all, and will result in an end to poverty.

They are laid out in the OP of two threads here. The End of Entropy is the foundation and The Ethical Planetarian Party Platform is the structure. They are linked in My sig.

I would be thrilled to know Your thoughts. [smile]

reply to post by Regenstorm

3. Indeed, let the free market decide, but without speculation which thrives the prices up and is unnecessary.

What is "speculation", and how do you separate it from genuine win-win investments or borrowing? Or would you outlaw all borowing with interest? If yes, then your economy would collapse overnight into stone age.

If you mean forbiding crazy derivatives and banks borrowing unbacked money created out of thin air (not savings), then I am all for it.

Yes, german national socialism had some good ideas when it comes to economy, but thats about it.