It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
BP officials tried to take control of a $500m fund pledged by the oil company for independent research into the consequences of the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, it has emerged.
Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show BP officials openly discussing how to influence the work of scientists supported by the fund, which was created by the oil company in May last year.
The documents are expected to reinforce fears voiced by scientists that BP has too much leverage over studies into the impact of last year's oil disaster.
Those concerns go far beyond academic interest into the impact of the spill. BP faces billions in fines and penalties, and possible criminal charges arising from the disaster. Its total liability will depend in part on a final account produced by scientists on how much oil entered the gulf from its blown-out well, and the damage done to marine life and coastal areas in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. The oil company disputes the government estimate that 4.1m barrels of oil entered the gulf.
Originally posted by AOA2012
Some Justice Finally
Originally posted by AOA2012
Some Justice Finally
Originally posted by TheOneEyedProphet
There wont be any man made "justice" in here, as all they could do even if "justice" went down at them would be to throw money at the problem but money cant replace food chains, or environmental impacts, or the millions of lives of sea critters everywhere in the gulf, as the event didn't obey orders and is now not localized, spreading further and further.
What will most likely happen is retribution in the form of an exchange in energy, imagine for a second the quantity of wasted energy free flowing in the sea water, what unimagined events led to the production of all of those quantities of oil, plant and animal matter transformed into fossil fuels, who had an existence before, who gathered and exchanged energy to the environment.
We saw in Japan an exchange of energy, we take much more than we are able to return and close the circle, and when we return it we give it back as crap and trash.
The planet will purge itself as it has always done, this will be the price to pay, and its not justice for me at least, "but just" the byproduct of a broken cycle.
Russell Putt, a BP environmental expert, wrote in an email to colleagues on 24 June 2010: "Can we 'direct' GRI [Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative] funding to a specific study (as we now see the governor's offices trying to do)? What influence do we have over the vessels/equipment driving the studies vs the questions?".
Originally posted by Section31
reply to post by soficrow
Russell Putt, a BP environmental expert, wrote in an email to colleagues on 24 June 2010: "Can we 'direct' GRI [Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative] funding to a specific study (as we now see the governor's offices trying to do)? What influence do we have over the vessels/equipment driving the studies vs the questions?".
So... BP wants to redirect some of the funding, so that a specific type of research can be done. Before anyone else replies to this thread, think about that statement for a brief moment. If British Petroleum is trying to find logical solutions, why should they not be able to direct funds towards a specific study?
My questions to everyone...
(1) If your company was responsible for a major oil spill (leak), would you do everything possible to fix the mess you made?
(2) If you saw a more affective means to fix the oil spill (leak), would you want to redirect funding towards its research and development?
Some of these protest threads are opened with insane logic. Don't be lead by online hobbyist articles who are looking to start trouble. People need to stop spinning this stuff.
I congratulate BP for stepping up to the plate, so that a more viable solution can be found.
edit on 16-4-2011 by Section31 because: (no reason given)