posted on Apr, 12 2011 @ 08:07 AM
reply to post by Cuervo
My apologies. I misunderstood.
Well, unforunately, that was the discovery they were alluding to. That was the "official update" as it were. They had a press conference to announce
it, and that is what the reports were alluding to. And it was found after reviewing data done over an extended period. (Eight years in fact.) It will
take them another extended period to repeat the experiment and examine the results. It isn't going to be forthcoming overnight. What has been reported
so far is
the discovery they said they were going to announce.
Now we have to wait for them to confirm it or dismiss it (which could be quite some time in coming, although some of what they'll be doing is to
simply go over their data again and make sure they didn't make any statistical and/or modelling errors. That could give confirmation, or probable
confirmation, a lot sooner; but even that will take some time. They have droves of data from this eight year experiment.)
edit on 4/12/2011 by
AceWombat04 because: (no reason given)