It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hessling
Okay, time I gave my #6!
The refusal by the Obama administration and DOJ to look into illegal activities by the Bush administration.
We'll never learn from mistakes if we do not confront said mistakes. Their are War Criminals who walk amongst us free and doing well.
Obama said that as president he would indeed ask his new Attorney General and his deputies to "immediately review the information that's already there" and determine if an inquiry is warranted -- but he also tread carefully on the issue, in line with his reputation for seeking to bridge the partisan divide. He worried that such a probe could be spun as "a partisan witch hunt." However, he said that equation changes if there was willful criminality, because "nobody is above the law."
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by bozzchem
A truly valiant effort on your part...but a FAIL as well.
Would you care to elaborate? Or are you just going to claim "FAIL" and not address any of the points?
What I would want to do is to have my Justice Department and my Attorney General immediately review the information that's already there and to find out are there inquiries that need to be pursued. I can't prejudge that because we don't have access to all the material right now. I think that you are right, if crimes have been committed, they should be investigated. You're also right that I would not want my first term consumed by what was perceived on the part of Republicans as a partisan witch hunt because I think we've got too many problems we've got to solve.
So this is an area where I would want to exercise judgment -- I would want to find out directly from my Attorney General -- having pursued, having looked at what's out there right now -- are there possibilities of genuine crimes as opposed to really bad policies. And I think it's important-- one of the things we've got to figure out in our political culture generally is distinguishing betyween really dumb policies and policies that rise to the level of criminal activity. You know, I often get questions about impeachment at town hall meetings and I've said that is not something I think would be fruitful to pursue because I think that impeachment is something that should be reserved for exceptional circumstances. Now, if I found out that there were high officials who knowingly, consciously broke existing laws, engaged in coverups of those crimes with knowledge forefront, then I think a basic principle of our Constitution is nobody above the law -- and I think that's roughly how I would look at it.
The bottom line is that: Obama sent a clear signal that -- unlike impeachment, which he's ruled out and which now seems a practical impossibility -- he is at the least open to the possibility of investigating potential high crimes in the Bush White House.
Originally posted by Hessling
I may be many things to many folks, but NO ONE has ever called me a Palin supporter. The reason is because my friends know I wouldn't vote for her no matter who the opposition was.
edit on 5-4-2011 by Hessling because: Spelling error
Originally posted by SmokeandShadow
Originally posted by CanadianDream420
If you really got change, you wouldn't like it. TAXES MUST be raised to pay off debt..
edit on 5-4-2011 by CanadianDream420 because: (no reason given)edit on 5-4-2011 by CanadianDream420 because: (no reason given)
I usually like your posts dude, but man, this is just false. If they taxed Americans 80 PERCENT of their wages it STILL wouldn't pay off the debt because of the interest on it.
Though we all know you worship OKast, are you privy to information that would substantiate your claims, that also refute Bozzchem? Or are you going to continue defending your buddy instead of contributing?
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Though we all know you worship OKast, are you privy to information that would substantiate your claims, that also refute Bozzchem? Or are you going to continue defending your buddy instead of contributing?
Originally posted by ladymerelda
reply to post by Whereweheaded
i swear if i had the money & was old enough I would just run. lol
people would rather watch idol, and dancing stars, or what rich housewives are doing. or idiots that are orange.
I don't get pop culture, I never have. my boyfriends sister is addicted to tv. its one of the weirdest things in the world.
how can people not see the things we see?
Originally posted by Hessling
President Obama’s top 5 broken campaign promises
www.rawstory.com...
President Barack Obama came to office on a tide of voters eager to see a change in more than just the White House's occupant. Two years into his presidency -- and one day after he launched his 2012 reelection campaign -- and even some of his most ardent supporters are having trouble coming to terms with the answer to Sarah Palin's 2010 question: "How's that hopey, changey stuff working out?"
How has that hopey, changey stuff working out for each of you? Not so well, for me and even worse for the many beliefs I have that Obama has pretty much snuffed out. Here's a list of the Top 5 broken promises from his 2008 Presidential Campaign courtesy of Raw Story.
Regardless of how you voted, this is what his supporters in '08 (including me) had hoped for.
Care to add anything more? I'm sure you can.
Mod Edit: External Source Tags Instructions – Please Review This Link.edit on 4/5/2011 by tothetenthpower because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by maybereal11
Originally posted by Hessling
I may be many things to many folks, but NO ONE has ever called me a Palin supporter. The reason is because my friends know I wouldn't vote for her no matter who the opposition was.
edit on 5-4-2011 by Hessling because: Spelling error
Well we have that in common