It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Asia Minor
it didn't go into space. Space isn't a vacuum. It really isn't empty.
The sound propagation should cease when the mean free path for air molecules becomes longer than a few centimeters. At room temperature and 760 torr of pressure (1 atmosphere), the mean free path is about 2 x 10-5 cm and is inversely proportional to pressure. Thus the pressure should ideally be reduced to about 10 millitorr to reduce the sound to the lowest possible level.
Originally posted by Asia Minor
It didn't go into details as to how they heard it but it certainly was heard. Your a bit late if you still don't know that their is sound in space. We have technology that regularly listen to the sounds in space. Gas exist in space as it does on Earth but is far more dense. There sound certainly exist in space.
[edit on 11-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
Originally posted by AgentSmith
Sorry, I thought this was a discussion about the Pink Floyd record.
I do apologise....
(Brilliant record BTW, I bought it for my Dad years ago)
Originally posted by Asia Minor
Sound in space can be heard. They may convert rays into sound, yet sound as we know it exist in space. The human ear isn't sensitive enough to pick it up. However. with sensitive microphones these sounds in space certainly can get picked up. You made another mistake as well. In space atoms CAN be at a distance of one atom percentimeter or it can be more packed than on Earth. It's where you are in space. Black holes have sent detectible sounds to prove this. Then again, it's all in the violence of what's producing the sound.
Originally posted by Asia Minor
Don't take this to heart, but your off topic and misleading. This is about the moon's far side. Another thing to the other's. Because the moon orbit the Earth it may be colder and hotter than the Earth at times. Not cold all the time. In a total eclipse it may likely be HOT. Is their life on the dark side Well, you guys are looking at these svcientist like they are your neighbors. They don't play in swings and have cookouts. If they are monitoring earth from the moon. They may be inside the ship for to navigate and abserve .
Originally posted by Asia Minor
What can I say? I really kinda like you as you give a pretty hard and respectable debate. But I like to let the facts do the talking for me. The moon reverbating? You wouldn't beleive it, but the sound resonated throughout the moon for over 2 hours? That's astounding to me.
[edit on 11-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
Originally posted by Asia Minor
What can I say? I really kinda like you as you give a pretty hard and respectable debate. But I like to let the facts do the talking for me. The moon reverbating? You wouldn't beleive it, but the sound resonated throughout the moon for over 2 hours? That's astounding to me. A bell doesn't even vibrate that long! This has happened a few times. Also, the moon is much older than the Earth. By 1 billion years and the moon is of a different compund than the Earth rock. Read up on the facts. If you care to learn, you WILL find it as I have presented this information. I never stated that the moon made a sound either. I simply said it vibrated, resonated or reverbated. You jumped the gun and misinterpreted it as sound. Am I correct?
www.geocities.com...
[edit on 11-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
From pubs.usgs.gov...
An interesting feature of these ancient rocks is that they are not from any sort of "primordial crust" but are lava flows and sediments deposited in shallow water, an indication that Earth history began well before these rocks were deposited. In Western Australia, single zircon crystals found in younger sedimentary rocks have radiometric ages of as much as 4.3 billion years, making these tiny crystals the oldest materials to be found on Earth so far. The source rocks for these zircon crystals have not yet been found. The ages measured for Earth's oldest rocks and oldest crystals show that the Earth is at least 4.3 billion years in age but do not reveal the exact age of Earth's formation.
...
The Moon is a more primitive planet than Earth because it has not been disturbed by plate tectonics; thus, some of its more ancient rocks are more plentiful. Only a small number of rocks were returned to Earth by the six Apollo and three Luna missions. These rocks vary greatly in age, a reflection of their different ages of formation and their subsequent histories. The oldest dated moon rocks, however, have ages between 4.4 and 4.5 billion years and provide a minimum age for the formation of our nearest planetary neighbor.
Originally posted by FatherLukeDuke
No I don't believe that the moon resonated for 2 hours, and you have presented no evidence. That website is so nasty that it gave me a migrane, and it also presents no evidence.
Originally posted by Crakeur
I'm surprised this hasn't been pointed out but that album by Floyd answers all your questions about the dark side of the moon. At the end of the last song, turn the volume up real loud and you will hear your answers. "there is no dark side of the moon. afterall, it's all dark"
I had to answer the age old question which side of the moon is dark for a fraternity pledging thing and it took me forever to figure out where to find it.
Originally posted by Asia Minor
You other guys are diluting the value of the thread, messing up the debate, talking about albums and babbling issues of no construction. And Father guy, generally, you counter someone's claim with something with ssome ubstance other than your own mere doubt. Back to the issue with mo ammo. Yeah. I am no stranger to the theories of the Earth's and Moon's origin. Actually, the idea that the moon was some old rock that was hurling through space and got tangled up in Earth's gravitational pull is old and rejected by most. Asteroids have passed closer by the Earth and have not stayed in an orbit. Mainstream science is borrowing from Black Islam's theory that the Moon was blown, split apart from the Earth by a great explosion/collision. The idea that the Moon was split apart and over time mysteriously molded into shape. Also, some believe it was blown from earth yet, was in pieces. It collected mysteriously by it's own gravity and formed the moon. Well, Those theories are are not cold enough to be accepted as to how the moon formed. For one, the moon lacks fluid which would be necessary in the it's "molding" into shape. The moon possibly cold have been molten liquid at first. After all, it's surface predominately consist of metals. If you have cleaned an oven before you would notice that the baked grease in a broiler or even on a gas stove looks like the moon. Especially when the grease pops and looks like miniature craters. But hold up. If that theory was true then the moon probably would look like a metal rock rather than a dirt rock. Not only that but the size of the object striking Earth would have to be quite massive. Where did it go? Also if the earth was what the moon formed from , the surface should be mostly Iron and ore which is what the Earth's mantle consist a great bit of. Also, the moon is much older than the Earth and we agree on the different compunds of which both consist yet differ. Also, the moon is much older than the Earth at being 1 billion years older my friend, not millions or thousands but Billions. Older astronomers believe that the Moon could be a satellite due to the quite constant activity they reportedly have seen. Some have reported that they have seen the massive structure moving across the Moon that Neil Armstrong was reported to have seen. mentioning Neil armstrong he claimed their was quite some threatening movements on the moon. Who knows?
www.geocities.com...
[edit on 12-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
[edit on 12-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
[edit on 12-2-2005 by Asia Minor]
Originally posted by obsidian468
[(...) the theorized density of space has decreased, the latest theory posted on that page being from 1995, stating that space has a density of 0.1 atoms per cubic cemtimeter. That would mean, on average, 1 atom every 10 centimeters. (...)
Originally posted by obsidian468
The "sounds" that we hear from space are audible conversions of other types of waves that can travel through a vacuum, such as electromagnetic and X-ray. Both of these are waves(...).
Originally posted by Macrento
One cannot talk about “the density of space”, period, without saying what kind of space. It can be interplanetary space, or interstellar space, or intergalactic space, each of these being vastly more dense than the next one on the list. Furthermore, density varies greatly within any of these three types of space.
For example, most of the “empty” space inside a galaxy (interstellar space) contains around 0.1 to 1 particles per cubic cm., whereas the typical density within a giant molecular cloud (the kind of “cloud” that contracts and forms a protostar, then a star) located in that same space is hundreds of particles per cubic cm. ( Compare that with the 100,000 in a good vacuum tube !) When density exceeds 100,000 p.p.c.c. (due to shockwaves from a nearby supernova explosion) the cloud starts to collapse into a protostar.
Within our interplanetary space, density is extremely high along the asteroid ring, as compared to other regions between our planets.
("Every 10 cm." should be "every 10 c.c.".)
If X-rays are not electromagnetic radiation, what are they then?