It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We as a nation have no constitutional right to bomb Libyan ground bases, shoot down planes, or patrol their air space.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Misoir
We as a nation have no constitutional right to bomb Libyan ground bases, shoot down planes, or patrol their air space.
Even if they ask us to?
In Iraq, we were going in uninvited, but in Libya the rebels are begging for us to put up a no fly zone. It is basically just making the two sides fight fair. Every boy in America knows if you see a bigger boy beating up a smaller boy, you step in and help. Or, if you see 2 or 3 boys kicking 1 boy on the ground, you step in and help. This is no different. The rebels are fighting for their freedom, and they want a no-fly zone, so that they are not massacred by the government in their struggle.
Originally posted by RizeorDie
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Misoir
We as a nation have no constitutional right to bomb Libyan ground bases, shoot down planes, or patrol their air space.
Even if they ask us to?
In Iraq, we were going in uninvited, but in Libya the rebels are begging for us to put up a no fly zone. It is basically just making the two sides fight fair. Every boy in America knows if you see a bigger boy beating up a smaller boy, you step in and help. Or, if you see 2 or 3 boys kicking 1 boy on the ground, you step in and help. This is no different. The rebels are fighting for their freedom, and they want a no-fly zone, so that they are not massacred by the government in their struggle.
making the two sides fight fairly? what about the pounding of iraq day and night non stop, how was that fair?
The Associated Press
BAYDA, Libya —
A rebel leader pleaded Saturday with the international community to approve a no-fly zone over Libya as Moammar Gadhafi's forces gained strength in the east, securing a key port city and oil refinery.
Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, the head of the opposition's interim governing council, also expressed disappointment over the failure to act by the United States and other Western countries, which have expressed solidarity with the rebels in their fight to oust Gadhafi but stopped short of approving any military action.
"If there is no no-fly zone imposed on Gadhafi's regime, and if his ships are not checked then we will have a catastrophe in Libya,"
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by RizeorDie
That is my point. US helping in Libya would be an entirely different scenario than US invading Iraq. In Iraq, there was no call for help, and the Aerial bombardment was in preparation for an invasion. In Libya, we have been asked for help, and enforcing a no-fly zone would just be a way of limiting Ghaddafi's assets, and giving the rebels a fair shot at resisting.
On the other hand, I agree with the other poster, who is to say the rebels are not a worse gamble than Ghaddafi? He has been very agreeable since Reagan blew up all his palaces. So, do we support the rebels just on principle, or do we evaluate and support the lower of the security risks? How would it look if we actually helped Ghaddafi quell the resistance?
I'm glad I am not in charge of these decisions!
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Misoir
We as a nation have no constitutional right to bomb Libyan ground bases, shoot down planes, or patrol their air space.
Even if they ask us to?
In Iraq, we were going in uninvited, but in Libya the rebels are begging for us to put up a no fly zone. It is basically just making the two sides fight fair. Every boy in America knows if you see a bigger boy beating up a smaller boy, you step in and help. Or, if you see 2 or 3 boys kicking 1 boy on the ground, you step in and help. This is no different. The rebels are fighting for their freedom, and they want a no-fly zone, so that they are not massacred by the government in their struggle.