It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aluminum is quite possible of cutting steel if there is enough Ke available.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
That was a good and fair post.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Here is the problem though. It is impossible to "prove" what temperature the fires were.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
We have the NIST report that says 250 to 400C was the highest sustained temperature, and they do so from samples taken from the impact area.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
We have youtube videos purporting to show heat signatures of around the same.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
We know the specifics of the fire, the accelerants and the air situation, and we have the smoke as evidence and it all seems to support the NIST reports estimate.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
We also have the firemen choosing to rush up almost 100 flights of stairs, and they were the fire experts on the scene.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
We also have hundreds or thousands of other fires from around the country and around the world that had hotter fuel sources and burned for much longer periods without collapsing.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
So, I think the NIST physical evidence, and the circumstantial evidence all point toward a relatively low temperature fire, for a relatively short period of time, in a building that was built to the highest possible fire code ratings
Originally posted by getreadyalready
because it was the tallest, most highly occupied building in the most dense urban area in the country. It seems self-apparent to me that fire should have been the last suspect in the collapse.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
So, I believe the fire data speaks for itself, but if we choose to ignore the estimates of the experts and speculate about fire parameters that we have no proof for, then I still say fire does not lead to a pancake collapse, and a pancake collapse doesn't happen in a simultaneous fashion.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
Choose any piece of the entire collapse puzzle and there is enough evidence to cause serious doubts about any one piece of the puzzle. Put all the pieces together and what are the chances of dozens of highly implausible things cascading into the event we all witnessed? I watched it live on television, and my coworker here watched it live from her office window in Manhatten! The building just went "limp" as she puts it and just collapsed onto itself like it had no bones. It went from a massive and rigid building to a bag of bones. I have personally spoken to people who were in Manhatten that day, and they all say the building just went limp. That is not a "pancake collapse."
Secondly, are you referencing recent codes, or are you referencing the codes from the 1960's.
Also, remember that some of the codes were "circumvented" so to speak. Not ignored, but the design was considered acceptable.
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
reply to post by GoodOlDave
The penthouse collapsed six seconds before
Sounds like another truster lie !
Wow a building just disintegrates into a tidy pile and collapses for some reason from the inside out because of tiny bits of damage and small fires, but of course this is all highly reasonable.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by FDNY343
NYC fireman are well-acquainted with high-rise fires. They know what to expect from these fires.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Logical one
It may not be common, but within minutes of the first strike, they had plans for the building, and they knew what type of fire they were dealing with, and they were addressing the safety factors of battling the blaze.
Posted Tue May 16 2006 20:03:44 your local time (4 years 9 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 12392 times: Quote: Hokkaido International Airlines, the Sapporo-based carrier known as Air Do, said Tuesday that birds hit one of its Boeing 767 aircraft in midair Monday night, leaving a hole in one of the plane's main wings. According to the airline, the two-engine jet, which had left Tokyo's Haneda airport, was about to land at Sapporo's New Chitose Airport around 8:45 p.m. when birds collided with its right wing, creating a hole about 30 centimeters wide. No one was injured in the incident, but it caused Air Do to cancel a total of 15 flights between the two cities, the carrier said.
The wings of a Boeing 767 are swept back approximately 35 degrees. This means wings do not strike the steel wall “flush” during the milliseconds of the crash process. Engines and wing roots impact first, almost simultaneously, and the wing tips, which are 40 feet back, hit a fraction of a second later. The official theory must be that wing roots and engines break through columns and spandrel plates following penetration of the “powerful” nose and fuselage, while wings stay intact to burst subsequent columns, floors and spandrel plates further away from the fuselage. The only way for tips to reach into the building and enter the “Hoffman shredding stage” is for the wings to remain intact and plow or “saw” through the steel columns and floors like an angled carpenters cut in the progressive fragmentation process (thanks to Gerard Holmgren for this point).
Originally posted by Yankee451
You are saying that regardless of mass and density of material, if you apply enough Kinetic Energy (KE) to an object…IE, make it go fast enough, it will cut through anything. In this example, you are arguing that a wingtip made of a lightweight and relatively soft metal like aluminum, when traveling at a certain velocity, will slice through very dense and massive structural steel, causing the plane-like cutout hole as depicted on TV.
Originally posted by GrinchNoMore
reply to post by GoodOlDave
The penthouse collapsed six seconds before
Sounds like another truster lie !
You are saying that regardless of mass and density of material, if you apply enough Kinetic Energy (KE) to an object…IE, make it go fast enough, it will cut through anything.
In this example, you are arguing that a wingtip
made of a lightweight and relatively soft metal like aluminum, when traveling at a certain velocity, will slice through very dense and massive structural steel, causing the plane-like cutout hole as depicted on TV.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Yankee451
You are saying that regardless of mass and density of material, if you apply enough Kinetic Energy (KE) to an object…IE, make it go fast enough, it will cut through anything. In this example, you are arguing that a wingtip made of a lightweight and relatively soft metal like aluminum, when traveling at a certain velocity, will slice through very dense and massive structural steel, causing the plane-like cutout hole as depicted on TV.
Errr but it wasn't "very dense and massive structural steel"
The twin towers had hollow tube steel bearing walls, purposely designed to be relatively lightweight to be more flexible to the wind.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Logical one
I have to give you that one, because I still don't believe they collapsed the way the supposedly did! I am certain the firemen never dreamed they would collapse that way, and here we are almost 10 years later, and a large swath of us still don't believe they collapsed that way.
I'm not sure if that helps your argument or mine though?
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by Yankee451
You are saying that regardless of mass and density of material, if you apply enough Kinetic Energy (KE) to an object…IE, make it go fast enough, it will cut through anything.
Thats a fact.
In this example, you are arguing that a wingtip
Why do you keeping saying the "wingTIP"? It wasn't the tip - it was the leading edge of the wing and you make it sound like the wings were hollow metal beer cans, there was a frame structure under that aluminum skin.
made of a lightweight and relatively soft metal like aluminum, when traveling at a certain velocity, will slice through very dense and massive structural steel, causing the plane-like cutout hole as depicted on TV.
Exactly! Now you get it. By the way, cut out wasn't really plane like.
Originally posted by Yankee451
Are you being intentionally misleading? "relatively lightweight" to what pray tell? The Core Columns?
How about relative to the wing?
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Yankee451
Are you being intentionally misleading? "relatively lightweight" to what pray tell? The Core Columns?
How about relative to the wing?
Err methinks you're the one being misleading!
Relatively lightweight as compared to the more conventionally built Empire State building.........remember the Twin Towers were one of the first to employ the tube-frame structural design.edit on 10-3-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)edit on 10-3-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Yankee451
Oh, so the Empire State Building collided with the twin towers?
Originally posted by Yankee451
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by FDNY343
One hour of hydrocarbon fire, even with chimney effect, is not enough to weaken thousands of tons of steel to the point of complete failure, period. Not even enough time for the heat to transfer to the steel.
With all that steel acting like a gigantic heat sink, the OS is an insult to any thinking person's intelligence.