It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by Mdv2
Reserves mean bugger all when it isn't being pumped. Sudan does 500,000 barrels a day, compared to Libya's 1 million, so not that far off, is it?
EDIT: But like I said, the Chinese put the block on UN action there. Guess who runs most of the refineries in Sudan?edit on 28/2/11 by stumason because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Danbones
im decendant from the 60 million or so indiginious slaughtered by that imperialism
Originally posted by Danbones
gahdafi is doing the slaughtering with mainly BRITISH WEAPONS
Originally posted by Danbones
yeah imperialism
an nation of shop keepers
Originally posted by Danbones
ever since the rothshilds lied about nappy winning at waterloo and the brits sold him your country
pennies on the pound
Originally posted by Danbones
you are a imperialist stooge not the boss my friend.
Originally posted by Danbones
you queen is a HUN
6:12pm
The US military says that is repositioning its forces in the area around Libya in order to be able to provide "flexibility [and] options", Reuters news agency has reported.
5:54pm
David Cameron, the British prime minister, says that his country is not ruling out the use of military force in Libya.
In a statement before parliament, he said:
We do not in any way rule out the use of military assets. We must not tolerate this regime using military force against its own people. In that context I have asked the ministry of defence and the chief of the defence staff to work with our allies on plans for a military no-fly zone."
Meanwhile, The Daily Mail talks about a “bloodbath that shames Britain”. The tabloid quotes a legal adviser at the UN High Commission on Human Rights, who says that “Britain might be guilty of complicity in the killings”. According to the paper, British weapons are believed to have been used to murder pro-democracy protesters.
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by Mdv2
Either way, the West would have done something about Sudan too had the Chinese not put the breaks on, which was my point you're so eloquently not addressing.
Libya is set to complete the first arms deal with a Western country since an international weapons embargo was lifted in 2004, after signing letters of intent to buy anti-tank missiles and radio systems from European aerospace and defence group EADS.
A Libyan source said that contracts worth a total of 296 million euros (£199 million) had been signed. One deal for 168 million euros was for Milan anti-tank missiles and the other for 128 million euros was for communications systems, the source said.
French Defence Minister Herve Morin said, when asked whether arms contracts with Libya had been signed: "They have not been signed formally. There is a letter of intent from Libya saying we wish to buy Milan missiles...there is also a letter of intent for radio systems."
EADS could not immediately be reached for comment.
The Libyan source said the contract for the Tetra communication system was signed with EADS, while the missile deal was signed with MBDA, the missiles affiliate of EADS.
On Wednesday, the son of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi was quoted as saying by French newspaper Le Monde that France had agreed to sell anti-tank missiles to Libya as part of a broader military agreement.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy clinched an accord on defence and signed a memorandum of understanding for a nuclear energy deal when he visited Tripoli last week, after helping to free foreign medics imprisoned in Libya.
France denies an arms deal was signed in exchange for the release of the medics but Sarkozy's spokesman David Martinon said his visit may have helped the deal.
"If French or Franco-German companies manage to negotiate contracts, then good, all the better for them," Martinon told France Info radio.
"It's true that President Sarkozy's state visit to Tripoli was very successful because the negotiations for freeing the nurses had gone through just before and, it seems that greatly accelerated things, to the benefit of French companies."
www.metro.co.uk...
Tony Blair helped to secure defence contracts worth £350m and the promise of more as part of the deal with Libya that allowed the Lockerbie bomber to return home.
The deals were signed during his meeting with Colonel Gadaffi in May 2007, when the then prime minister agreed to a prisoner transfer deal between the two countries. The disclosure has led to renewed accusations that the Labour government entered into a “terrorist for trade” agreement.
Senior officials with two companies which accompanied Blair on his “deal in the desert”, left with large hardware orders under the defence accord between the two countries.
MBDA, in which British Aerospace (BAe) has a 38% stake, left with a £147m contract for anti-tank missiles and a £112m related communication system contract. General Dynamics UK (GDUK) was given a deal worth £85m to supply the Libyan army with radios which could be extended to other elements of its armed forces.
During the talks, Libya also spoke with MBDA about its intention to buy surface to air missiles, a deal which would have been worth at least £200m but later fell through. The firm was also in the running to win further lucrative weapons contracts linked to a sale by France to Libya of Rafale jet fighters.
------
In 2007, just before the Libyan summit, the British naval shipbuilding company VT Group was negotiating with Libya to sell three high-powered patrol vessels the size of mini frigates, worth £400m.
www.timesonline.co.uk...
US must supply Israel with all the oil it needs even if the children in the US are all freezing to death.
But in-so-far, it's only western media that is giving a one sided story about Darfur. If I recall, it was an idiot journalist from New York Times, who increased the number of dead from a few hundred to 200,000 dead within a week period, pluck out of the sky.That number was never proven. The psych ops went forward from there. Notice that the western "Free Media" never ever mentioned much about the Rebels there - and that the US are supporting and arming them. These arm chopping machete rebels are no angels.
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by Mdv2
Anyhow, I find it remarkable that we, the West, apparently have no problem with a genocide taking place in Darfur, which has already taken the lives of over 300,000 people and left more than 3 million displaced, while the military option suddenly become a very plausible one when there's a violent conflict of a much smaller scale in Libya.
Just to add some balance to your slant here, but Darfur and South Sudan are actually very oil rich themselves. So the old line of the West trying to "install a friendly regime in an oil rich state" doesn't actually hold water on analysis. I think that you will also find that UN resolutions pertaining to Darfur were either blocked or watered down because of the Chinese and Russians then as well.
10:51pm The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) says that it suspects that Libya received a shipment of military equipment from Belarus as the government began a violent crackdown on protesters.
SIPRI says an Ilyushin-76 aircraft left a military base near the Belarusian city of Baranovichi and landed at the Libyan airport of Sebha in mid-February.
"The aircraft came from a dedicated military base that only handles stockpiled weaponry and military equipment," Hugh Griffiths, an arms trafficking expert at SIPRI, said.
He added that the Sebha airport where the plane landed was a key military logistics base in Libya's south.
Griffiths said a Libyan government plane has made two trips to Belarus in the past week, although it is unclear who or what cargo was on board.
.