It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EssenceOfSilence
The root of all the rebellion and problems in the middle east at this time are a result of a weak dollar. The dollar is weak in part due to the wars. If we had not invaded Iraq, there is a chance the dollar would not be in the trouble it is in now. So, in turn there would not be instability in the middle east.
On the other hand, if we had not invaded Iraq, I am sure the US would have invaded some other country, so the effect would have been the same, and you may be right. But if Saddam was still in power and he had to deal with protest like they had in Egypt, he would have just gassed the whole lot of them and smiled.edit on 22-2-2011 by EssenceOfSilence because: Changed a we to a US
Originally posted by HoldTheBeans
Originally posted by EssenceOfSilence
The root of all the rebellion and problems in the middle east at this time are a result of a weak dollar. The dollar is weak in part due to the wars. If we had not invaded Iraq, there is a chance the dollar would not be in the trouble it is in now. So, in turn there would not be instability in the middle east.
On the other hand, if we had not invaded Iraq, I am sure the US would have invaded some other country, so the effect would have been the same, and you may be right. But if Saddam was still in power and he had to deal with protest like they had in Egypt, he would have just gassed the whole lot of them and smiled.edit on 22-2-2011 by EssenceOfSilence because: Changed a we to a US
On the contrary we invaded Iraq to try and save the dollar. Iraq was going to trade oil in euro's and if that occured then the dollar as the world reserve currency could have been in trouble. As it turns out it appears to have just put it off for a while as Obama is signed up for the new world currency club and trading oil in SDR's it appears.