It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Throwback
Receiving an abortion is not an entitlement.
Originally posted by Throwback
Now stopping these funds does what to the deficit?
Originally posted by Throwback
reply to post by SevenBeans
Look at the other posts. Federal money is most likely used minimally for abortions. In 2008 Planned Parenthood took in $966.6 million and of that only $349.6 million is government money. Of all the cases Planned Parenthood does only 3% of them are abortions. This is not an entitlement.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
Originally posted by Throwback
reply to post by SevenBeans
Look at the other posts. Federal money is most likely used minimally for abortions. In 2008 Planned Parenthood took in $966.6 million and of that only $349.6 million is government money. Of all the cases Planned Parenthood does only 3% of them are abortions. This is not an entitlement.
I don't care if it's ten dollars, the government has no business forcing people to help pay for someone else's abortion. Do you know what an entitlement is? Expecting someone else to pay for your abortion is certainly an entitlement.
Originally posted by Throwback
So you'd rather go after the smallest of reductions than go for real money savers? Like allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices, trimming the defense budget, or fixing the tax code?
Originally posted by Throwback
You know Republicans want to cut the government funding of Planned Parenthood by 75 million? That's it. That really goes a long way.
Originally posted by Throwback
You're ignoring the fact that we can't prove that government money is being used for abortions.
Originally posted by Throwback
Still you didn't tell me how those bills are "rubbish" but I guess I'll never know.
edit on 18-2-2011 by Throwback because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Throwback
The real question is what do abortions have to do with the economy or jobs, which Republicans ran on. I wish they would stop trying to push their crazy social agenda and push a sensible economic agenda. That won't happen though.
Originally posted by Throwback
reply to post by Rockpuck
Once again, we don't have proof that federal dollars are paying for abortions.
Originally posted by SevenBeans
What does her experience have to do with the government paying for abortions?
The answer is... NOTHING.
The issue is a funding issue, a government role issue etc. etc. her experience is irrelevent.