It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
there's no proof a planets swings into our inner solar system?
Sometimes proof isn't found, it's realized!
There was NO proof the Sun was the center of our system back in the days. It was assumed due to critical thinking.
Same with our tenth planet. Nibiru. Or Nemesis. Or Tyche. Or whatever.
Originally posted by lestweforget
reply to post by stereologist
Stereo your posts are so repetative and therefore so predictable, how can someone be so dedicated to come on to every Nibiru/2012/doomsday related thread to so quickly and arrogantly deny all possibilities?
Have you ever had anything positive to add to a discussion? Most people dont bother going onto threads they dont believe or have no interest in, you are obviously a paid disinfo warrior.
So it begs the question, what government department pays your wage?
It is truely sad that there are people who are so logical they can't see past the nose on their face.
We need logic don't get me wrong.
But, Logic will only get you so far.
As someone already mentioned, According to logic, at one time, The Earth was the center of the universe.
This was the best logic from the best scientific minds of the day.
It was also physically impossible for lighter than air flight.
Anybody using "Logic" could come to that conclusion.
None are so handicapped as those who use logic as a crutch.
I am very sorry for the effect these people have. They have truely been the ones holding us back for centuries.
It was also physically impossible for lighter than air flight.
This thread is about opinions. Not necessarily facts because this is all about unknown circumstances, conjecture and possible reasoning.
To those who refuted everything in this thread I laugh at the irony in you claiming logic as your source of "knowledge" when it is ILLOGICAL to claim KNOWLEDGE on anything in the first place...especially things with as many variables as ice-ages and elliptical orbiting brown dwarf stars and most especially the bible and the history of earth.
The problem with using "logic" is that it doesn't take into account "unknowns" or variables...it is DEAD SET on making a conclusion based on very limited information...which is asinine. This is why I have very little respect for science in comparison to philosophy.
It is only after new information comes to light that the pushers of logic/science realize that they had been using faulty logic.
IF PLANET X IS NOT A PLANET, THEN WHAT IS IT? -
Originally posted by YoungMind92
reply to post by Human_Alien
Is it fun to ignore someone who actually stuck up for you and asked you valid questions I think its so rude that you have not answered me yet. I would still like my answers please .?