It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I disagree on the "hoax" thing. Mistaken, perhaps. But there have been plenty of examples of people, lone wolves in the timberland, claiming one thing when "everybody" knew differently...that were eventually shown to be right. So just because he is alone in his claims does not necessarily follow that he is creating a hoax.
But, to be fair, unless you know one way or the other with evidence, it might be better to suggest both possibilities, rather than choosing one and claiming it as fact.
and if we eliminate this hyperinflation, the age of the universe is pushed back to...oh...16.4ish...? [/.quote]
Do you have any evidence for this claim? I very much doubt that.
The age of the universe according to Calleman is just one of the date mistakes in his fictional hierarchy that he has composed for the gullible.
None of his dates work. Every one of his dates is a failure just as is his age of the universe. Calleman is off by 20% - a whopping failure.
Please provide any sources for the age of the universe. Your tossed out list of dates are at this time an unsubstantiated collection which need to be checked.edit on 8-2-2011 by stereologist because: (no reason given)
Seems consciousness did, in fact, make a small but definite shift toward greater emphasis on "ethics" at that point.
There’s the faintly misogynistic “The Northern Wind, The Sun and Me,” where you play as the wind trying to blow a girl’s skirt up, and the harder you pee, the harder the wind blows.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Amaterasu
I disagree on the "hoax" thing. Mistaken, perhaps. But there have been plenty of examples of people, lone wolves in the timberland, claiming one thing when "everybody" knew differently...that were eventually shown to be right. So just because he is alone in his claims does not necessarily follow that he is creating a hoax.
That's not what I stated.
I stated that Calleman has a viewpoint which is in great contradiction with what is known about the Maya. He is either a dunce or knows he is perpetrating a hoax.
But, to be fair, unless you know one way or the other with evidence, it might be better to suggest both possibilities, rather than choosing one and claiming it as fact.
There are many examples given that show Calleman is a hoaxer. His 9 levels are well known to be a western viewpoint placed on the Mayans and not of their creation. The attributes such as galaxy and mammal are not of Mayan origin.
Calleman is either a dunce or a hoaxer. I really doubt he is a dunce. He has managed to make a living by authoring books for the gullible.
Originally posted by Student X
That's not exactly what I said. I said THIS [particular claim of a coming 'new consciousness'] is not a job for reason and evidence. Its a job for consciousness.
"Reason, leave now! You’ll not find wisdom here!
Were you thin as a hair, there’d be no room.
The Sun has risen! In its vast dazzle
Every lamp is drowned." -Rumi
Yeah, "skeptics" usually fall for the whole MDC publicity stunt. Looks like you have fallen for it too. Thats another indication that you are not a true skeptic, but just another uninformed armchair pseudo-skeptic dancing to a misleading debunker tune.
RANDI'S PRIZE: What sceptics say about the paranormal, why they are wrong and why it matters
I will take the liberty of assigning you some homework, pseudo-skeptic.
For starters, the above book.
Then these ones.
Varieties of Anomalous Experience: Examining the Scientific Evidence
An Introduction to Parapsychology
The Trickster and the Paranormal
Hopefully all that evidence will snap you out of your pseudo-skepticism so that you can adopt a psi-conducive state of mind before you miss out on the 'new consciousness.' I will hope for you. Good luck.
"There is always some madness in love. But there is also always some reason in madness." - Nietzsche
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Amaterasu
and if we eliminate this hyperinflation, the age of the universe is pushed back to...oh...16.4ish...?
Do you have any evidence for this claim? I very much doubt that.
The age of the universe according to Calleman is just one of the date mistakes in his fictional hierarchy that he has composed for the gullible.
None of his dates work. Every one of his dates is a failure just as is his age of the universe. Calleman is off by 20% - a whopping failure.
Please provide any sources for the age of the universe. Your tossed out list of dates are at this time an unsubstantiated collection which need to be checked.edit on 8-2-2011 by stereologist because: (no reason given)
The problem of determining the age of the universe is closely tied to the problem of determining the values of the cosmological parameters. Today this is largely carried out in the context of the ΛCDM model, where the Universe is assumed to contain normal (baryonic) matter, cold dark matter, radiation (including both photons and neutrinos), and a cosmological constant. The fractional contribution of each to the current energy density of the Universe is given by the density parameters Ωm, Ωr, and ΩΛ. The full ΛCDM model is described by a number of other parameters, but for the purpose of computing its age these three, along with the Hubble parameter H0 are the most important.
Originally posted by UndeadDinosaur
No, dear Student, I fear your memory has failed you. Let me step you through the events in sequence.
Ironically, the author had to employ some method of reasoning to formulate those ideas.
Originally posted by Akragon
5 pages of arguements...
is there any specific event that happened at any of those dates in the "Galatic underworld" bar that would lead anyone to believe we are a "fully ethical society"?
I just did a quick search but honestly....Fully ethical?
Nov 3rd 2010..
www.answers.com... ??
Nov 24 2006...
www.google.ca...=en&source=hp&biw=971&bih=519&q=Nov+24+2006&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=Nov+24+2006&fp=2cebb34f216005c8
Nov 19th 2007...
www.google.ca...=en&biw=954&bih=519&q=Nov+19+2007&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=Nov+19+2007&fp=2cebb34f216005c8
Nov 13 2008...
www.google.ca...=en&biw=954&bih=519&q=Nov+13+2008&aq=&aqi=&aql=&oq=Nov+13+2008&fp=2cebb34f216005c8
SO...Feb 11th 2011...leads me back to something i posted a few days back
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I don't understand why people would take these prophicies seriously... so we'll see i guess...
3 days and counting...
Originally posted by Student X
I'm not going to play along with your disingenuous rhetoric. If you can't or won't see that I was referring to a particular claim, then I think we have irreconcilable differences that will prevent fruitful conversation.
Again, you are disingenuously trying to twist my claim into something I didn't say. Reason and evidence have their place. So does a hammer. But not everything is a nail.
I am not going to continue with you. I will leave you with those books I linked you to and wash my hands of you. Goodbye and good luck
Originally posted by cluckerspud
People think that new consciousness is coming and are expecting it greatly., Only because they are too lazy to change their lifestyle on their own. Always expecting a greater force to better themselves. Just live your life and treat others as you would yourself. There's your new consciousness.
Lame to think that that when the calendar flips suddenly things will be different. Delusional.
edit on 7-2-2011 by cluckerspud because: (no reason given)