Is This Nibiru!

It simply is amazing how trivial it is to prove that Nibiru does not exist or that a second sun does not exist. Any new mass in the solar system would cause the motions of the planets to change in response to the new mass. Such changes would be noticed if a planet sized object were within 70AU. That's 2X the distance to Pluto. A planet sized object would be caught on whole sky surveys out 320AU if it were Earth sized or larger. A Jupiter sized object would be caught out 2100AU or farther. That's assuming that the object only reflects and does not radiate.

This is a 2009 video. Why hasn't this second sun been seen since then? Why was it only seen in this video next to the Sun? Because the source of the light for the so-called second sun was the Sun. It's no coincidence that the so-called second sun is the same color as the Sun.

reply to post by stereologist
[mo

RETRACTION

reply to post by NWOnoworldorder


Maybe he is trying to educate people who without asking any question believe total BS like Nibiru have you thought about that, well as you seem to believe in it WHY do no amatuer astronomers seem to catch this on film or a picture why is it always some IDIOT on you tube with an iphone

So what date will it arrive so we can have a good at you the day after!

What would Nibiru do?

If that was a second sun and that close to old Sol, there would have been visible exchanges between the two.

As the time nears, and as I cannot see any large planet, the only possible explanation (assuming it exists) is that we are being prevented from being able to see it from some kind of mind control/hollographic technology. It really could be the elephant in our living room so to speak. In terms of its elliptical orbit, and in terms of it containing other planets, I believe that it is more likely to be a star or solar system that intersects the orbit of our solar system around the galaxy, thus refered to as the planet of the crossing/highway star, planet X, X as in crossing etc.

reply to post by SystemResistor


X has always referred to X as in unknown. The search for a new planet in the solar system is old. The reason for the search was that there was a difference between the observed motions of the planets and the predicted motions of the planets. That spurred the search for the cause. The case was resolved in 1989 when Voyager 2 flew by Neptune. The path of the probe showed that the estimated mass of Neptune was wrong. Once the mass was corrected with the value derived from the probe flyby the difference between predictions and observations went away. Hence there is no missing mass int he solar system. The search for an unknown planet was sort of over. The search has moved to far out regions of the solar system with the understanding that there is no planet sized mass close to the orbits of the known planets.

Wouldn't SOHO have spotted this object if it was real? I would think so because SOHO has spotted Comets before so a planet would definately stick out. Right?

reply to post by Stari


SOHO points towards the sun. If the device is not pointed in the right direction it won't see something. Unlike SOHO whole sky surveys are pointed outward and watching what is out there. Nothing can sneak in.

reply to post by stereologist


Yup... I was pretty sure that something else other then a camera from the ground would have spotted another Star in the sky, no matter where it was.