First, here's the link I used:
NOTE: The page number references to the page of the .pdf, not the actual document.
The quote the OP is referring to is found on page 23. It is part of this statement:
Indeed, she saw a danger in adopting Plan B (that is, research into geoengineering), if that were even feasible, which I would question, but the
danger in adopting a Plan B is that you do not apply yourself to Plan A, and the point of Plan A is it is all entirely do-able.
She is talking about research
, not implementation. She even questions any "Plan B" actually working. The report mentions many different types
of geo-engineering, of which anything atmospheric is a part. Read the entire document to understand the differences.
In other words, the Plan A, which is working to reduce emissions and is ongoing now, will work, and we should be promoting those activities. Any Plan
B should be researched, but not implemented without some form of global regulation, but
she doubts any of the plans discussed would
Not an admission of "chemtrails", or even anything like "chemtrails". It's a call for the world to work on the problems together, from the first
research and discovery through planning and implementation.
It's the correct, conservative thing to do about a global phenomenon.
And for the red herring "chemtrailers" who think that "chemtrails" agenda is geoengineering and who keep bringing the act of cloud seeding into the
discussion, cloud seeding is acknowledged but is not considered geoengineering. Behold, the experts conclusion:
We conclude that weather techniques such as cloud seeding should not be included within the definition of geoengineering used for the purposes of
activities designed to effect a change in the global climate with the aim
of minimising or reversing anthropogenic climate change.
This is found on page 18.
Interesting note on this thread: I am the fourth poster. The OP's links do not work, so no one can actually look at what he is referring to. This
thread already has three stars. Why?
edit on 23-1-2011 by stars15k because: question needed asked.
edit on 23-1-2011 by
stars15k because: typo