I was recently reading some threads here on ATS and clicking on the links
provided by posters. The poor grammar and spelling errors can be accepted
as it's our general way to make mistakes and also English is not everyone's
The verve that some people write is also a reason that some threads and posts
struggle to get their point over and again, that can be overlooked... it's the way
of the internet, I suppose.
The main issue I'm putting this thread out is to find some answers about terms
like 'Disinfo Agents'
I was recently accused of being one of these strange people... (I'm assuming they
are people and not aliens, demons or many other strange creatures mentioned here
on ATS)... and I realised there isn't anyway to prove that that I am not.
But is a 'Disinfo Agent' paid by an agency or Government to deny any OP's conspirital
view or is it just someone who disagrees with another and the words are merely used
as an insult?
I am fifty years-old and I live a simple life, I have never met anyone from the so-called
'shadows' of an agency or Government and this sort of supposed behavior must go on
without myself being able to see through the veil.
The idea that agencies or Governments are spraying the skies to either protect the
planet or to kill their fellow-man is one of the subjects that draws 'disinfo agent' shouts
and I was guessing that these 'disinfo' people don't work from a central office, so they
must sit at home and have the 'anti-people' information sent to them.
I'm not very good in regards with understanding computer-searching and may well be that
some of these strange characters can hide their locations from site owners and management.
When a view is shown about any subject here, the 'you-work-for-NWO' slur always raises
it's ugly head and I suppose that if these folk who disagree with the OP, must feel hurt...
But are these people young, old, married or single? Do 'Disinfo Agents' have friends and
have the burden of not being able to tell welcomed people around them? Their loved ones
must either not know that their trusted spouse, son or daughter are accepting the 'Queen's
Shilling' and doing the bidding of others or accept it and ergo, are involved.
The other part of my 'rant' is that it's accepted by many around this site that the 'mainstream
media' are 'in-on-it' or know the real truth -but proclaim by the means available to tell the
populations of their individual countries that anyone thinking that those in power are involved
in a world-wide conspiracy is a nut!... a weirdo.
But do these journalists have to sign an agreement when they acquire their qualifications to be
a journalist to not divulge what is really going on? Are they approached by somebody from a
Government or agencies and told that when writing about UFOs, the Loch Ness Monster or any
of the plethora of 'out-there' subjects, the 'rookie' Journalist must treat it with levity?
My final section of this 'grumbling' is in regards of wordsmithing.
When one sets out to show their view, the talent of getting the reader or viewer to accept certain
parts of the subject is done by using distraction, we emphasise parts of our comments with certain
key-words... 'strange craft, unknown object, Governments refused' can make our eyes move along
The parts that the writer wants the reader to accept with faith -are set within the sentence so
that the reader can somehow agree with the writer's 'proof-by-lateral sense' and therefore, the reader
needs to read or view more to seek the truth!
We all fall for it, it's our curiousty that have made us go so far and do so much, we seek the truth
to make us feel safer... like ducks following the dog along the riverbank, we need to keep it in our
view instead of running away from it.
So, I'll go and cash my 'Dis-Info Agent' cheque and prepare to derail some more subjects that are
considered by 'mainstream' media as whacky!
Damn!! I've given myself away.
What do others think?
edit on 20-1-2011 by A boy in a dress because: Missing text and sentence-rearranging.