It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As a general rule, 75 percent of a campaign’s outlays will ultimately go to paid communication: direct mail, radio, television and Internet ads, said Craig Smith, the campaign manager for Sen. Joe Lieberman’s presidential effort in 2003-2004.
...
“They’re spending some on staff and travel,” Smith said of the current contenders. “It costs money to raise money. The candidates are raising money at a furious clip; that’s a lot of flying people around and setting up events. They’re also putting staff in the key states.”
...
A 30-second TV ad on the 6 p.m. local news in an Iowa media market such as Waterloo will cost between $400 and $1,200. But to run the same ad on the local news in Los Angeles will cost about $4,000, according to campaign consultants and TV ad directors.
Originally posted by Alxandro
Yep, I still get email from Obama, Biden and their crew, although I 've noticed I have been getting more and more from them lately.
Why act so surprised?
This guy is always in campaign mode.
The first two years he's on vacation, the last two he's raising funds.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by beezzer
I agree it will be interesting to see what his platform is for this campaign. But if GW Bush got elected a second time, it's more than likely that Obama will. Anything can happen.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by beezzer
Yes, at city level is still some that are just for the people injustices but when it comes to state and national level too much private finances are involved perhaps you should rethink who is at the top of the tea party food chain.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Greensage
Instead of "Yes we can" how about "Meh, we tried"?
Originally posted by Alxandro
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Greensage
Instead of "Yes we can" how about "Meh, we tried"?
Instead of "Yes we can" how about "No you shouldn't "?
I mean, if you really think about it, his only major "accomplishment" may be repealed.