Discussion: Was the Arizona shooting designed to DISTRACT from the Animal Die-offs?

Originally posted by Crutchley29
ATS is going down the #ter because of threads like this.

The animal "die off's" were only abnormal because the media reported on them, and a few colonies don't equate to the end of the world, there are hundreds of thousands of birds that die in mass groups each year...reporters never batted an eye lid before and now they do ATS is up in arms yelling "CONSPIRACY! CONSPIRACY!"

Crutchley29, you do realize this is ATS, right? This isn't your church's discussion forum, this isn't your NPR's comment section, this is Above Top Secret - from the browser headline:

"Discussion Board Home Page for Conspiracy Theories, UFO, Paranormal, Political Madness, and other "Alternative Topics"

I think you are in the wrong place.

It doesn't really matter if it's related to the animal die offs specifically or not.

There are 'things we know, things we know that we don't know, and things that we don't know that we don't know".

Smoke screen is used to keep you more towards # 3. You don't know that you don't know.

reply to post by Traydor

That's a perfectly valid argument Traydor. I think DaveakaRNG who posted just before you made a good point that if anything, this latest shooting will be USED to change things about our freedoms that will work to the advantage of the Government.

At the same time though, what I'm seeing is the A) timing of the shooting and B) how almost NO ONE is talking about the animal die off now, or the that Wheeler guy either. The coincidence just seems peculiar, but like you said, if it were more than a coincidence, it doesn't make 100% sense.

Originally posted by vermonster
Yo SaturnFx

Gulf of tonkin. FRIDAY august 7th 1964


Your logic stinks

edit on 9-1-2011 by vermonster because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-1-2011 by vermonster because: (no reason given)

Not my logic, its media logic I learned watching commentary news throughout the years that explained this. Rachael Maddow spoke of how most really wacky political crap happens on fridays that are highly unpopular to avoid the media cycle.

So, feel free to call up seasoned media personalities and tell them their logic sucks.

Besides, we are talking about todays media, not 1964...

reply to post by harrytuttle

whole thing linked i reckon, they jumped on this straight away to get the nut job loner story out however the codes they didn't expect to be out there, is it true these vids only went up on the 7th, seems something has gone on deep in the weeks leading up to the whole scenario?

I'd like to point out that it apparently will divert attention from the Pentagon child porn scandal, though I don't think that was by design. Just a bunch of lucky bastards...

Hopefully people will pay attention next week.

reply to post by muzzleflash


and this we don't know? i don't know so i'm gonna get offa this one, its way toooo deep! this could be bigger than most of us!

reply to post by harrytuttle



I'm also begining to think along this line too that the Jared Lee Loughner was a sleeper and this was done to take the focus off the animal die offs around the world. Something big is brewing in the back ground. Just like the BP thing. To me the BP thing was another 911. The BP Revelation 8 in the bible, 1/3 of the waters poluted, the eclipse, the animals dieing around the world, just like the movie The Seventh Sign. All of the movies being made is presented as science fiction based on fact and in a way of telling the masses this is the disclosure. Don't forget about all the dead whales and dolphins that were washing up on the shores to. I begining to realize that everything in the last decade things have been happening along this line. A conspiracy theory no, more of truth presented as science fiction. Go and study the 100th monkey theory. Man had 2000 years to mature to this point. We are all being held back from this. This 100th Monkey is something very strange. I know if we started learning his teachings 2000 years ago and kept passing this on to future generations to now we would not be here now.