It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr Mask
3) Unable to even phantom that something "unknown" conspired on that day.
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
This is nothing but educational TRADITION.
The physics of this problem is GRADE SCHOOL LEVEL.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
This is nothing but educational TRADITION.
The physics of this problem is GRADE SCHOOL LEVEL.
Why then won't at least one of these 1,400 architects or engineers publish something detailing this alleged grade school physics? It seems that should be a piece of cake. It seems quite telling that nobody is up to the task after ten years.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
This is nothing but educational TRADITION.
The physics of this problem is GRADE SCHOOL LEVEL.
Why then won't at least one of these 1,400 architects or engineers publish something detailing this alleged grade school physics? It seems that should be a piece of cake. It seems quite telling that nobody is up to the task after ten years.
Originally posted by backinblack
I guess we call all ask why NIST doesn't show all their workings..
Results without knowing how you got there are not possible to review..
Stop complaining about A&E and take a good hard look at NIST..
Originally posted by Cassius666
The whole reason they have a problem with the NIST report is that it was all made up. They want a proper investigation, that leads to conclusions. Replacing something the 911 comission and nist made up, with something somebody else made up, is not going to cut it. First you have a proper investigation, which THEN yields answers, where possible and not muslims did it and this is what happened maybe.
Originally posted by Cassius666
It really isnt about believes, unless you want to make it a question of faith, then you have no use for facts I guess. Nist can not stand up to scrutinity, only because it is easily realized what is bogus, does not automaticall give you the answers to what happened, that still requires and investigation.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Simply being an architect or engineer does not give anyone special knowledge or insight as to all the details of 911. Belief that it does is a logical fallacy called the appeal to authority.
Pitting this congregation of architects and engineers against an NIST report brings up the issue of peer review. The NIST report is published, and though not perfect, is widely accepted as being fairly accurate. The A&E group, as far as I know, has not published any scientific, peer reviewed papers that demonstrate the "truth" of 911 as they see it.
At best, such groups can only arrange themselves into a mob, all with the similar viewpoints, and hope that their titles of pilot, architect or engineer can legitimize their opinion (which is simply "I don't believe it"). If they are experts and have any degree of scientific literacy then they should be encouraged to publish their science and subject it to the normal channels of scientific methods and peer review, etc. Otherwise, no rational and reasonable person will take them seriously.
Originally posted by Cassius666
And the conversation carried on from there with you and others. So the thread got a bit derailed I guess. But we can stop talking about nist and get back on topic on why 911 deniers think we can not take A&Efor911 truth seriously. And I just mentioned that they want an indipendent investigation, you need the investigation first before you can publish anything. Yet you demand A&E puts out papers, based on what exactly?
Originally posted by Cassius666
What makes you think A&E has a preconceived notion?
They have reason to say that not a good job was done on investigating the attack and the collapse.
What is the problem with an indipendent investigation? It should yield the same result, if nist and the 911 comission did a good job.
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by traditionaldrummer
They are.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Thats where you are wrong. So far they showed that nist worked from a predetermined conclusion and was looking to fudge facts to support their conclusion. They did not get their investigation yet, so there is nothing to have a problem with yet.
The only problem is a level playing field. The nist report does not need to be peer reviewed and does not show how they reached their conclusions.
If somebody would produce an investigation that contadicts nist, not only would be demanded that every single digit of their work is rendered public, but a rigorous cross examination of their work would be demanded as well. The Nist report is just an opinion paper and any report I compile carries just as much weight as the nist report.
Originally posted by Cassius666
Well yes, thats what I said, that we do not arrive at the truth just by thrashing another investigation. But you can still call a spade a spade and a non investigation for what it is. I never said that by disqualifying nist you magically get the answers. You make your case on why an indipendent investigation is needed.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
This is nothing but educational TRADITION.
The physics of this problem is GRADE SCHOOL LEVEL.
Why then won't at least one of these 1,400 architects or engineers publish something detailing this alleged grade school physics? It seems that should be a piece of cake. It seems quite telling that nobody is up to the task after ten years.